I did laugh quite a bit when I heard she was appointed. Y’all better hope the deep state is real haha.

I did until seeing this headline 5 times a day for the past week.

Hey that’s like, your opinion bro.

No one was asking them to put this ban in place, and hardly anyone noticed it for an entire year, so how did that help them in any way?

The graphic content excuse makes zero sense because, according to them, they still allowed signups with mobile. Plus they knowingly kept the ban in place for a year while being notified by users the entire year.

Is anyone gonna talk about the article or just virtue signal about hating monarchy?

I hadn’t heard albo wanted to become a republic, that’s pretty interesting, but unlikely to materialise into anything because the Australia public almost certainly won’t vote for it.

This is par for the course of Lidia Thorpe, she’s been very hard to work with, even for other Aboriginal activists. She’s a contrarian that’s doesn’t seem to do much besides complain, just like the commenters on Lemmy.

The only reason I use it is because Reddit killed the mobile app I was using. Lemmy is less useful to me by every metric, and I still use Reddit when searching for stuff on desktop, never Lemmy.

Yes.

Ideally you don’t take their word, you send journalists and international investigators to the scene to verify.

What you definitely do not do however is take Hezbollah’s word.

Idk anything about Iran but it doesn’t seem that simple https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/khameneis-presidential-choice-weak-reformer-or-strong-hardliner

The supreme boofhead seems more concerned with revolutionary guard power grabs. Or maybe this guy is a ploy to increase voter turnout for better optics and he’s okay with throwing the IRGC a bone.

Would still be nice if this guy won I guess.

Redditors but with extra steps

As a basic bitch that hasn’t gone to page 2 of a google search in years I don’t really notice a difference.

The ai answers, related questions, and ad results are not especially helpful but at the end of the day I will find what I’m looking for.

I was curious if it was possible to get a tanky to agree with the easiest shit ever, the undisputed issues. Like I said, I’ve never really seen them talk much outside of memes.

Apparently it’s not, they will die on the authoritarian defense hill before ever acknowledging the trampled masses they claim to represent. They are like Trumpers but without the veneer of patriotism.

I could grant you every irrelevant assertion you made about the location of protestor murders, and that BS about think-tanks and it would mean nothing because, again, that has nothing to do with the actual grievances people have with the CCP, which you will never address because you are a complete hack.

I don’t need to engage with a CCP cuck in all their petty talking points to know I don’t want to be a CCP cuck with petty talking points. You do you bro, your life is a joke.

All I want to hear from you is an admission that the CCP murdered protestors, and that they jail people without giving families or the international press any contact.

Thanks for posting your thoughts, I don’t get many opportunities to hear tankie brainrot as it’s often purged from my feed before I even open the comments.

#1 whatever did or did not happen at the specific location of Tiananmen Square doesn’t address that the Chinese government murdered student protestors. Doesn’t matter if it was two blocks over or on the other side of the country. The CCP will use lethal force against protestors.

#2 a think tank has nothing to do with all the Uyghurs whose family members have disappeared without a trace. The CCP makes people disappear and they offer zero transparency into their judicial process.

You’re quibbling over minor specifics and ignoring the undisputed parts that are most damning. Stop being a propagandist for a government that doesn’t even align with your proported beliefs just because ”america bad".

Bold of you to assume I know how to read!

You callin’ him a liar? >_>

4 years without a headline. The AFP didn’t even consider this objectionable. The AFP are scum.

The case had been discussed for months in a process before a preliminary chamber where the accused could challenge the evidence of the prosecutors.

On Friday, the court in Bucharest said the case met the legal criteria and would proceed.

So what’s the difference between this and a conviction?