Israel’s ambassador to the UN, Danny Danon.

I have only heard a few things, but if the US and Israel don’t want it, I assume it’s something good for the world.

I don’t think that the semantic discrepancy is really the point.

I just meant that if you think that protesting there is important then you should organize something. I’m fine with what we’re already doing.

Go ahead

That’s hilarious, I learned about that not too long ago. Can you give me a good recipe, I want to try one.

“Besides, what if she were to claim that America wasn’t the land of the free, how would THAT look?”

I really hope they’re still teaching opportunity, capability, and intent as the deadly force “triangle” (i.e., all 3 must be present in order to use deadly force) in addition to the justifications for the use of force, none of which are “somebody told me to.”

I think it’s literally just a coincidence. I’ve never heard anything else at all about or from her.

I’m just learning this woman exists, so I assume she’s mad about her money.

“Military aged male” is such a fucking disgusting phrase to begin with, I don’t think anybody should be using it outside of very specific contexts.

It has the same energy as “breeding aged female.”

That’s a self-defeating attitude. Be careful with what you’re looking for, because you’re likely to find it. If you’re looking for reasons that she doesn’t like you, you’re going to find them!

Clearly not, right?

Reach as far as I can, use trickle-down soapenomics to take care of the rest.

He wears a disguise
To look like human guys,
But he’s not a man,
He’s a Chicken Boo

It’s a government official making a claim based on easily verifiable bad evidence, so if the whole thing wasn’t suspect before, it most certainly is now, right? Why should we give the benefit of the doubt? Not only has the administration not earned that right, they’ve shown over and over again that they don’t extend that benefit to anyone else.

It fucking amazes me that we don’t hold our leaders to a higher standard, and it worries me that people don’t seem to want to.

So what should we call the thing that we don’t want in our social media feeds that controls what we see?

You’re right, and I suppose I should have answered that way, but for now I’m undiagnosed and unmedicated. However, being aware of the pitfalls I at least feel better equipped to understand and counteract some of my more detrimental idiosyncracies.

I think most of the time when the conversation comes up I don’t feel “qualified” to talk about it because a doctor hasn’t given me the ADHD Purity Seal of Approval, and in turn I feel a little bitter there seems to be this sort of “label that explains why you’ve struggled your whole life,” but I don’t get to have it because of a technicality.

I’ve heard that, too. Hell, practically everyone is saying it.

I tried to get tested, but when I took the initial questionnaire I felt like so many of my coping mechanisms were working that the questions didn’t really apply. So I don’t have ADHD, I’m just a lazy fuck, I guess.

So much for tolerance… in anonymous online forums? Schadenfreude for public figures is easy enough to come by in real life that it should be no surprise to see it shine through online

It’s a particularly bland style