How do we know they didn’t get the reward for the tip on Luigi?
I genuinly don’t know, it doesn’t look to be a source here.
edit: Rewards are awarded after a conviction
Since most rewards require a conviction, Larry might have to wait until a trial completes, which could take a year or more, the Associated Press reported.
Don’t worry. Men usually aren’t the gold diggers.
I mean that there are people who (none named, none forgotten), have a tendency to get lost in fiction and forget about reality. I mean that there is more to gain by deriving happiness from something real.
Whilst i think happiness derived from fiction is real, I would refrain from letting it be my only source of happiness.
I could think of a million things in the world that i would like to do if I hade the resources to do them. None of them are fictional. But i can experience a glimpse of them through fiction.
I’ve seen plenty of abusive mothers on tv. But they aren’t physical in their abuse.
But have a look at “Precious” if you want to be triggered.
Man, this is the kind of dark humor i like.
I don’t see the issue with thin models, or that people would rather look at them. What should be banned is retouching the images to the point of being unrealistic.
Thinking that the left doesn’t need defending from stupid ideas…
Well, that source is a crock of nonsense. It’s the Swedish equivalent of breitbart.
We do however have contract with elbit regarding digitalization of our military.
https://www.svt.se/nyheter/utrikes/sa-ser-sveriges-handel-ut-med-israel-kring-krigsmateriel
I suppose. Am from Sweden and we really only export weapons. If we actually stopped trade, that would be something.
Its easier to stop purchasing is what i mean.
How big was their export to begin with, i wonder?
They are as tech literate as they are sport iliterate in my experience.
The fact that the community superbowl exists here to continue perpetuating a meme is peak irony. There are so few people interested in american football here that the intention has flipped, meaning a picture of an American football match would be funny.
This paper estimates that 4.5% of the population is psychopathic:
Has psychopatic traits*
I don’t understand why, but they dont account for sociopathy at all in that study.
I would agree that 5 % of people have psychopatic traits. To varying degrees. Many of those that take riskful jobs have psychopatic traits, it doesn’t have to be an “evil” job. Pilots, fire fighters, police, doctors, etc all have some parts of their job that is fitting for someone with traits that allows you to ignore risk to the benefit of others.
Diagnosed psychopathy is very rare in comparison.
Pretty big number you’re throwing around. 5% seems like bs to me.
Where is that number from?
If i had to make a guesstimation myself, it might be 1 in 400. Maybe
No, of course not the MAC. Just as an example nmap can guess the OS based on fingerprinted behaviours. There are pentesttools that can guess the OS.
Like i said. Old days. You could get access to a distribution switch where the physical security was all that mattered. The town where i grew up had some early variation of cg-nat that meant all devices where in a way on the same network. It created plenty of issues when trying to play online with friends during Quake/WC3 etc.
Your ip is the identity of your router.
By using simple tools you can find the manufacturer of your router and potentially use a known security to gain access to your network.
You expose yourself to being targeted by focused network attacks, since they know the address belongs to you.
In ye olden days, it would have been possible to track your ip and what it was accessing online. Its harder to do today due to cryptography and vpn’s, but still a risk.
Well. The segmentation is to avoid security holes from Rogue third party devices. If you can access my pc vlan that only exists on my wired pcconnection, then you have indeed broken in to my domain. Letting the things that doesn’t give a shit about security have their own network is just sanity/sanitary.
So your plan to have him removed from power is what?
Genuine question since you don’t seem to want to win elections.
Obviously he’s a cunt, so winning against him should be a cakewalk then.
So baseless thought. It would be interesting to consider the moral implications of taking money to uphold the law as it is.
I seriously doubt OP had a joke in mind, i think they didn’t check if anyone actually got a reward and really thought no one did.