The point of blockchains is decentralization, and as Lemmy users we know that decentralized services are difficult to make popular, even if they’re an improvement over their competitors.

There are now Bitcoin Ordinals, which are similar to NFTs but with a sufficient size limit to actually store the media itself.

Literally everyone relates to this.

If you believe something as common as this is sufficient to diagnose a mental disorder, you might’ve been misdiagnosed (or your diagnosis was explained insufficiently).

~sexism

I do have an idea how “a difficult to kill, unwanted growth” could be put into relation to a war fueled by hatred.

None of them have to.

If you are trying to imply that potatoes and vegan meat aren’t awesome food you are factually wrong.

Your Nana when she was young:

Humans eradicated species of animals long before even the medieval ages.

It’s just a thing humans do.

I don’t know what your definition of “chasing” is, but whatever it may be it seems to be independent of the group that’s being “chased”.

So in that case you could say “chasing” is bad while a preference is not, completely regardless of whether you’re talking about trans people, disabled people or any other group.

Why would one preference be less valid than another?

Perfectly fine to be into disabled trans people imo.

In Germany the liberal institutions decide who can and cannot run, and they have decided the commies are out

Back in 1946, it was decided that antidemocratic parties shouldn’t be part of a democracy. Hence antidemocratic parties are illegal.

That’s it. You are very much allowed to abolish private property if you wish to do so. You’ll just have to do it in a democratic manner.

And it just so happens that abolishing private property is very much not a popular idea.

(No, the current German government can not decide who can run in elections.)

Do you see instances who’s main purpose is to represent “people inside the more mainstream American Overton window of mid right to far right” that are even nearly as popular as Hexbear?

If you’re browsing all you frequently see posts from Hexbear users. I’m yet to come across a noticable amount of posts from users from an instance which represent the group you mentioned.

(I couldn’t even name a single instance that fits that description, because if they exist, they’re not nearly as active as Hexbear.)

Toxic people exist on all public instances. But on some they’re more common than on others.

The issue with Hexbear is that their users tend to talk in a very demeaning and insulting manner. About half of the popular posts on Hexbear are about making fun of people or communities. Their political views are less of an issue; it’s more about their toxic behaviour.

anymore

They never did

You really think such a ban isn’t supported by a large amount of voters? You think it’s purely the “bourgeoisie” that’s transphobic?

All 3 systems use openssl and get attacked using Heartbleed.

(And even if they don’t reuse even a single piece of code, attackers can still just use multiple exploits.)

goalpost moving […] is exactly what I got from you

I’m not sure whether you believe to be arguing without moving goalposts. Do you want me to tell you about some goalposts you moved? (E.g. asking me to apply my statements regarding Germany to all countries, including the USA.)

all to justify unlivable wages

Oh, the people in Germany (whom I was talking about all along) are living just fine.

the status quo is shit and failing far more people in the world right now than it is benefiting

Perhaps. Good thing I never claimed the status quo to be successful in all countries.

Can you please quote where I [made a claim about the USA]?

Smug status quo liberals like you phrase their bad faith questions like that all the time, but just in case you will surprise me, here.

[lots of quotes]

I’m sorry, I don’t see where I explicitly mentioned the USA in those quotes.

Was it “A large part of the world’s population”? (Note that it doesn’t say “the entire world’s population”.)

You are obnoxiously ignorant of living situations outside of your own to the point that you prescribe maintaining the status quo to people you don’t know that don’t live anywhere near you do. You made the extraordinary claims, not me.

okay

Again, your ignorance is showing, paired once again with your arrogance.

sure

It is not working for most other people

Again, I never claimed that capitalism is well implemented everywhere. I only claimed that

it can work well without UBI

I made no such claims about Germany, but you certainly did about the United States

Can you please quote where I did that? Because I never made any global claim. I always referred either to “many countries” or “Germany”, neither of which explicitly include the USA.

And according to your smug status quo advocacy, those people getting any more pay or being treated with any more dignity is bad

They can get paid more. But they’re already dignified and already well paid (in Germany).

If you bent down and talked to someone sleeping in the street (as the rate of homelessness now rises here)

Where is “here”? Some country which didn’t manage to implement capitalism successfully? I never claimed that calitalism does work everywhere, I claimed that can work everywhere.

Maybe US capitalism is shit. But it can work well without UBI (as proven by, you guessed it, Germany).