Fair enough!
I’m sure it’s cheaper than 67 mil since they can launch at cost and not worry about profits but it’s definitely more than just the cost of the satellites.
For anyone that doesn’t click…
It was 200 satellites. Estimate is based on the cost of a falcon 9 launch ($67,000,000) which can take about 50 satellites.
Cardboard burns up pretty quickly. I would think the fire would be contained in the oven no?
It’s probably 5/5 lol
I believe he admitted it was lies
Bush and his cabinet all knew
Metamucil for regularity
What a fucking saint
Everyone knows guns are deadly. Not everyone knew tobacco was. Tobacco companies knew and withheld that information and marketed their products as safe.
Probably more doable but doubtful with the current Supreme Court.
Hostile but ok… I’m talking about intentionally misusing a car to kill people illegally like running someone over on purpose, not car safety standards like a defective airbag or something.
3/4 states would need to ratify an amendment repealing the 2nd amendment. I can’t imagine any amendment being ratified in my lifetime let alone one repealing the 2nd amendment.
I’d rather start with legislation that has majority support and a realistic chance of passing.
You can legally kill someone in a self defense situation so just because guns are designed to kill doesn’t make them different from another product that can be used illegally.
Cars can be used to kill people illegally and we don’t hold the manufacturer responsible.
IMO holding manufacturers responsible would just lead to a legal mess and a waste of court time/resources. I’d rather have better background checks, and other limits on gun purchases.
Yes probably not the best advice. Edited so it’s clear it’s only a joke.
Could smoke some weed. Maybe the cotton mouth will cancel out the drooling.
Edit: only joking of course!
consumers may also help reduce system costs by adapting their electricity consumption to the availability of renewable energy
From the linked paper. They mention some other options for storage like batteries (plenty of environmental issues there though) but based on the quoted text I have a hard time taking this seriously if they actually expect people to change their behavior.
The jump comes from a low base as the EU did not import significant amounts of LNG before the war in Ukraine due to its reliance on piped gas from Russia.
Always read the articles people!
It went to a lot of automated text message spam and it was annoying as fuck