that statement could certainly be seen as being about any number of potential rapists in the government. it’s telling that trump is jumping in front of that statement.

He also does the things that many of them do. Trump isn’t the only (child) rapist predator, he’s just the most powerful one.

If I pull the string what else does it say?

Why should your comment exist? Why should sky exist? Why should exist? blah blah blah

Gee I wonder what his new political party’s salute would look like?

Why do you think Herman Cain had to go? I’ll give you three hints, and they’re all “9”.

It is “not possible to meet with the number of people that want to see us” in the way that it is “not possible to meet with” 0 people, I guess.

Yeah that was disgusting, not worth the click and is clickbait (and a lie). How is the Daily Beast allowed as a news source anyway?

I’m just imagining earth as a flaming marshmallow now

oh yeah, you’re the voice of the common clay or whatever. just shut up. It’s so infantilizing and patronizing.

that’s a grand stand you’ve put together. bravo.

I don’t care about winning people so disconnected that living through 4 years of horror didn’t convince them that 4 more years of horror wouldn’t be horrible.

Are you talking about 5 year olds? Otherwise I’m pretty sure everyone we’re talking about was on the planet during Trump’s last term.

yeah, it is not newsworthy when CBP does their normal, admittedly rather annoying job

I think the left should take musk at his word here actually. Take the W. Keep calling this stupid Nazi shitstain fraud exactly what he is.

Trump: “Does this guy know how to read a defense folks”

but what does that mean for the future of my made-in-russia imported glavprodukts? I don’t know what I’ll do without them

Check the notes.

I like how you copied someone else’s actual original work to make your own (imo lesser, but to each his own) version of it but called the original creator’s work “slop”.

We are primates, and when we put all the martial arts together (MMA) it turns into a match of who can get on top of and neutralize their opponent. A bear doesn’t have any way of attacking a primate if the primate can get to its back. As a human, we wouldn’t have the dexterity or strength to get around, cling onto a bear and choke it out, but a bear-sized gorilla probably could and once it does that it’s neutralized every mode of attack the bear has except writhing around and pushing it into other objects.

I don’t know, but they’re physically capable of it. I once had an anthropology professor who demonstrated the difference between simian-like arms and quadruped-like arms, and the major part of it was noting that you’ve never seen a cat spread their arms out like the Vetrivian Man (they can’t). In the evaluation of ape vs. bear combat I don’t want to discount the capability of the ape to grasp, latch on or choke.