each party

Who decides who is a “party”?

It biases them towards catering to public demand instead of being a neutral arbiter of justice.

But they’re biased anyway, towards whoever has the power to take away their job. They’re never neutral arbiters of justice.

Removed by mod

it’s entirely Stallman’s own fault for being a freak

Takes notes

Removed by mod

Terrible report, doesn’t even say the cause of death.

you’re attributing those views to “the citizenry”

I haven’t attributed anything to the citizenry. I wrote two distinct paragraphs, only one of which contained the word “citizenry”.

at the scale of the current riots and violence

You never mentioned scale. You’ve introduced a new concept. You’re shifting the goal posts.

What other comparison is there? suggest a different comparison

Why is making a comparison important?

“Why 5 years”

I wasn’t asking why 5 years, I was asking why you’re saying the violence has ramped up compared to any time period at all? Why are you comparing to a time period?

If you want to enter into a discussion then use your brain and answer the extremely simple question asked of you.

I’m not trolling.

pick a date

Why?

I am just saying the violence ramped up very recently compared to the last five years for an example arbitrary date

Why?

the last five years

Fascist violence has been around in the UK for longer than five years. Where did five years come from?

Its only since labour came into power the far right have decided to be violent.

Uhh…

You’re trying to say the whole population is rotten based on a few negative examples

I’m not trying to say that. I’ve no idea why you think I am.

They seem to not want immigrants. And I suspect “immigrant” means “doesn’t look like me”. In other words, it’s just “they took are jerbs!”

The make-up and mindset of the citizenry doesn’t change just because the government changes.

LibreCAD … not open source

FYI, “libre” means free, as in free speech:

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html

I’m glad you’ve realised that what you wrote was incorrect.

The “guy” is a Russian expert and former CIA on the … Russia desk.

Assuming that’s true then he’s a Russian expert and former CIA [officer?] on the Russia desk who’s written an article full of non sequiturs, supposition and just plain nonsense. He’s a Russian expert and former CIA officer on the Russia desk who’s a deluded fool.

But you probably have no clue what that actually means, do you?!

It means the embarassment from having written this article is even greater?