It will depend on the people and how you approach them, some will be happy to learn your interest, some will expect that it goes both ways and some will not want to be bothered. That’s just normal human things.

Yeah, I was giving another idea in case there is no expected use.

Sense of wonder from discovering how different people from different places think similarly or differently of the same experiences, or different experiences you never thought about.
Otherwise, maybe trying to interact with the immigrants probably covering the essential jobs in his small town that nobody else wants to do.

Trust the power of repetition, check the Anki app if you haven’t.

I think there’s quite a big difference between operating the car yourself based on GPS instructions and letting an LLM write your code, if that’s what you mean. The equivalent would be asking the model only what to do, and then coding yourself based on its instructions.

The only thing NDAs can really cover are true trade secrets that could cause actual damages to the company.

Isn’t it very easy for companies to argue any confidential information/agreement would damage them?

If they state an error margin of ±2 cm, I may allow it.

It seems none of them exist sadly.

c/Showerstrokes

That’s a strange move. I would have picked flying tiger in the sky.

Isn’t it the basis of the military that you have to follow orders or you will be arrested? I guess he didn’t.

What did she become after her cat period?

No, the same energy would be:

~ I agree with these antiracist actions, but I would rather not have it come from someone who committed racist crimes.

If it was not his intention, why would he start with I agree? He could have only kept the whataboutsim part. Can you consider he may be against both, or is that too far fetched for your intention guessing ability?

The comment said he agreed with the post.

You are answering to someone from a tankie instance, expect their views to be aligned with authoritarian left and take them with many grains of salt. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie

Wouldn’t deaths from battlegrounds be too small (before world wars) to impact a group’s genetics?

It will not make a difference in how illegal and wrong it was, but having some verified numbers about the percentage of civilians casualties over combattants helps understand if it was mistakes/collateral damages of military targets, or something worse.

Would you have sources for this number? I checked quickly and the numbers were quite smaller.

Nice, I didn’t know about couque biscuits. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Couque_de_Dinant