If it’s so easy how come you can’t do it Donnie?

Rest in piss

Yes? What are you trying to tell me here? That’s a different article. With different information. That’s kind of how news works. Sometimes new articles are written with new information about topics.

Story says it’s from March 16th. The post seems to be made either on the 16th or the 17th. Seems pretty not old to me.

No but on the way to the game they wore the Men’s Team USA hockey jerseys and listened to a speach from a weirdo maga moron so I wouldn’t be too hopeful.

Those countries have been directly funding Donald Trump and are all littered with American bases. They are absolutely involved.

Why should it stop?

Slow genocide.

Lot cooler when it is though.

I’m not sure if they do. Considering the way the Trump Administration operates it’s very possible they would just declare one and start drafting people. Any lawsuit would take years to happen cuz the Supreme Court would push it back.

Although even if they did have to I’m not sure if that would be an impediment. Every single Republican will vote for whatever he tells them to. So it could pass in the house. As for the Senate if Trump gets rid of the filibuster as he seems primed to do right this moment then it would be easy.

It literally says Americans and mentions Trump by name. Was that not specific?

Probably a good idea to start teaching the young guns about grenading.

Straight to a concentration camp probably.

Why?

At this point either Trump commits to a land invasion and we have 20 years and trillions of dollars and tens if not hundreds of thousands of American lives wasted, not even counting how many millions of Iranian lives would be wasted as well. Or Trump backs down and asks China to act as a mediator because there’s no way Iran would trust Trump to negotiate.

Well if the US won’t allow them to play then it seems the US team should have to Forfeit.

But I am asking to the people doing the attacking, but also asking to anyone who has and is capable of launching a nuclear weapon.

Yeah I think maybe sentences like this are why you come off as vague and unclear. Because you just said two different things in two halves of that sentence.

Do you understand deterrence or not? You say you do but your entire line of questioning seems to make me think that you do not. The entire point of deterrence is it’s up to the attacker to understand consequences. They’re the ones making the choice. They can either not attack and not be nuked or attack and be nuked. That’s the choice they’re making. That’s the point of deterrence.

Because you’re asking the wrong people. You don’t ask the people about to be attacked if they understand, you ask the people doing the attacking. Do they understand the repercussions of using a nuclear weapon. Because if they attack that country they’re going to cause it. Get it? That’s the whole point.

That’s the overwhelming message of the 20th and 21st centuries. If you don’t have nukes then the US or Russia is gonna mess with you. Get nukes.

All the more reason for him to declare regime change accomplished and victory then no? To say regime change is the guy at the top only, as he did before.