Your interpretation sounds pretty likely to me. I’d guess if they get nukes, they’ll go Israeil’s way and will newer admit to it publicy.

well, I don’t care anymore. I just unsubscribe and run sieve filters to get rid of junk mail. That’s something I hate with a passion!

I used to maintain a zero unread mailbox. At some point I stopped. Email is just a public global todo list, than any one can write to. It’s okay not to read them all.

solid advice.

Great move. I did this last year after a decade of gnome and can’t be happier. I use sway for work and KDE for pleasure.

deleted by creator

That looks fantastic. Like you have the best of both worlds.

Not an expert, but you need to define your “threat model” first. Whom against want you to harden your security?

This is my thought literally every time.

Haha good catch!

Fun observation: as a native, just like many natives, you have made a grammer mistake. “have known” and not “have know”. Might be a typo though.

My fun theory is that grammer is just a form of heuristic made up by humans to simplify understanding languages.

I’m not a native.

For Europe it’s FOSDEM.

There are two things that still fascinate my adult mind. How things looked in the past and how they’d look in future once they are abandoned.

Came here to say this. Instead of pronouncing your name on the phone, just read the NATO alphabets that constitute your name.

Syncthing

Same here. btw, I just subscribed to [email protected] , it has over 500 members, so you might want to check it out.

No, not really. I’m still learning my way around in Lemmy. I use wefwef.app and just recently the developer has added a subreddit import feature which might be able to find matching communities for you. though didn’t work great for me.

boss move

It’s very interesting indeed. A while ago I read Carl Popper’s Open Society and it’s Enemies. In that book he argues that Plato and to some extent Aristotle have developed underlying philosophical tools to support, for a lack of better term, “closed” societies. For example slaves rather remain slaves, farmers remain farmers, and rulers remain rulers. He argues that they contribute to a totalitarianism, and undermine democracy by discouraging being equal and in general “change”.

Take all this with a grain of salt, since it’s a while I’ve read the book, so can’t articulate it better. But your comment reminded me of all this, so I thought it might be interesting for you and other readers.

ps: I personally think there is no natural place for things, that’s us, sentient beings, who define that and give things meanings.

haha, yes, all hope is lost there…