mechoman444

Not sure what to think about this… On one hand good. On the other hand the system that deported him is the product of pure evil.

Then again watching them eat each other alive is amusing in its own right.

Huh. He did exactly that…

You don’t have to concede anything. No one ever does anyway.

The fact that this is a courtroom or a Lemmy comment thread doesn’t somehow negate the accuracy of the language being used. The context doesn’t change what the words mean.

And frankly, there’s nothing for you to concede. You’ve already admitted that I’m right and you’re wrong. Your only remaining argument is apparently that because this isn’t a courtroom, I’m somehow wrong—which is some impressive mental gymnastics.

“You’re right in the only place where it matters, therefore you’re wrong here.”

Okay. You said some stupid-ass shit, got called out on it, couldn’t come up with a response for weeks, and what you’ve finally come up with is still bullshit.

Don’t worry about it. I got you.

Thanks for admitting you were wrong.

Shit dress them up in Walmart tactical gear give them some cheapo balaclava call them ice and tell the fucker they’re there to take them to an award ceremony… Then black bag him in the back of the van.

Jeez… It is amazing how I can learn about a new low these people can reach.

It’s books for children.

Extradite? We’re in the same country. Just go freaking pick him up.

Well… That was quick.

Doris Miller is such a bad ass name.

Trump, however, is not.

I think I downloaded open office like 20 years ago. It hasn’t changed much and only just now started getting updates again.

I should probably switch to libreoffice but I’m too old and set in my ways. That and I don’t really use it for much more than the most basic of word processing and spreadsheet.

What? You can be here when you get there.

Lol. They don’t like AI around here. It was good though.

Most people don’t understand that media like this isn’t just a prompt put into grok. It’s 100s of hours of actual work, scripting voice acting editing and a pipeline of different applications and programs to achieve something like this.

Gossip.goblin on YouTube is ridiculously good. Highly recommend.

With great power comes great responsibility.

Yeah I get it unless you’re a morally corrupt psychopath.

Ya… And?

deleted by creator

Doing some toilet-bowl Googling, I found that the word “come” has been used as a euphemism for orgasm or ejaculation since at least the 17th century. It wasn’t until the latter part of the 20th century that the alternative spelling “cum” became common, specifically to remove the ambiguity between the sexual meaning and the ordinary verb come. So you were absolutely right to prefer the spelling “cum” for that reason. The spelling was then further popularized through the rise of pornography and erotic media in Western culture.

Very interesting thread.

Just a little side note for everyone. Climax. The word you’re looking for is climax. Or orgasm if you want to be totally technical. Not come, or cum. Climax.

Everyone is using some form of cum/come when talking about climax and I think it might be a little confusing for op.

Have you been watching any political discourse? Literally no one off the Epstein list has been arrested.

Jesus Christ.

He shouldn’t even be talking to the supreme court at all! That in and of itself should be grounds to arrest him!

You’re arguing a different issue than I am.

First, your hypothetical has very little to do with how federal appellate courts actually function or the kinds of injunctions they issue. If you’re going to discuss the scope of judicial authority, it helps to use examples that reflect how the courts actually operate.

Second, precision is the foundation of legal discussion. The fact that this is the internet doesn’t somehow make factual accuracy or precise language irrelevant. My comment was a narrow factual correction to an incorrect statement about the judiciary. Nothing more.

Third, I’m not interested in taking the conversation where you’re trying to take it. You seem to want a broad, emotionally charged debate about nationwide immigration policy. That’s a perfectly separate discussion, but it isn’t the one I was having.

Finally, I have no issue with emotion. Passion has its place. What it doesn’t do is change how the law works. If the discussion is about the legal authority of federal courts, then the answer depends on legal precision, not rhetorical intensity.