It took 3 grand juries to even be able to bring the case, it was always going to end in acquittal. Sure, it’s technically assault, but nobody was going to convict for that.

Or use canned food.

I was kind of hoping the defence would produce a receipt that confirmed it was a BLT without onions, hence proving the agent committed perjury.

I feel like that stuff might be horrifying to most, it’s exactly what his base wanted. I guess it might peel off the ones that just believed his economic ‘message’.

I mean, when he was on the ballot last time he did win. He has a way of drawing out his voters that luckily doesn’t easily transfer to other Republicans.

Basically every ‘terror plot’ they’ve uncovered since 9/11 involved the FBI working out the plan and providing everything to the suspect, but somehow without it crossing the legal line into entrapment.

Yeah, I haven’t either. I don’t even know how I installed it (package manager or raw). Will need to look into that.

Yeah, I’m not believing that version of events for a second.

Yeah, I still have champagne in the fridge from his last health scare.

The mainstream media has always had a problem with just calling a lie a lie.

I used to run it for a while (it might actually still be running, I’d need to check my VPS and delete it if it is), but I feel like RSS readers kind of got overtaken by Reddit (and Lemmy). I tried going back to it again a few times, but the lack of comments felt off after having experienced Reddit.

Yeah, those people that think having a businessman running the country would be better are either business owners themselves, or have never actually worked in a business.

Congress has cameras. If you’re lying to Congress about factual things, your memory of the event shouldn’t matter.

I mean, that’s literally a change some states made in response to the Weinstein scandal. If it’s reasonable to assume the truth isn’t going to come out before the statute runs out, I’m definitely in favour of making it longer. It should probably still exist, but 5 years seems very short for serious crimes, especially considering how slow the justice system works.

Democrats should definitely take something from that playbook, but there’s been many cases of someone lying in front of Congress and not facing consequences. It happened in the leadup of both Iraq wars, and I don’t think people should just be allowed to get away with stuff like that just because the clock ran out.

Obviously part of the problem is that Democrats don’t seem to be interested in prosecuting stuff like that in the name of bipartisanship, but that’s how they got where they got now.

The problem is that the DOJ isn’t as independent as people would like it to be, so you basically need a change in administration to hold someone to account, which could take longer than 5 years.

I know these particular charges are probably bullshit, but I don’t think there should be a statute of limitations for lying to Congress.

The ADL has no credibility though. They count saying ‘free Palestine’ as an anti-Semitic attack, even when a Jew says it.

I can’t think of any recent cases besides the guy that shot Steve Scalise. Do they have a list of cases they’re going off, because 67% seems low.

What was Kamala’s plan for achieving peace in the middle east exactly? If you think things would’ve been different with her, she definitely didn’t tell the voters how she’d do that. It was Biden that defunded UNRWA based on fake stories and kicked off this famine.