azuth

Why do you compare reading the code to reading an EULA ? A nefarious or compromised closed source program can still do nasty stuff not described in the EULA.

This is the price of continuously shitting on international law. Others can do it too. Especially when your goal in breaking international law is to overthrow that other country.

Why the fuck would people in Rome have passion for Spain?

;;;;;;;;

Edge is the only Chromium‑based browser I’ve tested that behaves this way. By contrast, Chrome uses a design that makes it far harder for attackers to extract saved passwords by simply reading process memory.

It decrypts credentials only when needed,

From the article abstract in the OP

Because they are slave states with no regards for human rights?

You have an insanely distorted view of the world.

It is only fair you get something back for all those decades of support to Israel.

Greek name meaning he who likes horses, the name of Alexander the great’s father, then a Spanish King’s who colonized the islands.

Therefore actually spelled with a Φ and the issue being different transliterations of it.

It’s a DNS override. DNS is what turns URL addresses (www.Lemmy.org) to IP addresses (127.1.0.42) which are what is used to actually connect to another computer.

Normally your PC asks a DNS server,usually provided by your ISP by default, unless there is an entry in the hosts file.

So authorities often ‘block’ websites by just asking ISP to not return the true IP for a URL. You can get around that by putting the IP in your hosts file. You can also block websites by adding an entry on your hosts file that point to local host (your PC).

You seem to forget that the A-10 is only about 50 years old. The armor, redundant controls, and flight capabilities (such as being designed to fly while missing half a wing, half the entire tail, and an engine) are there to keep the pilot safe. They have landed after being hit more than once, and entirely due to it’s design.

Yeah, it was also designed to kill tanks with the gun which it doesn’t do. As for flying with missing half a wing, it hasn’t happened with an A-10. An F-15, an unarmored plane, has landed missing a whole wing in real life. Many planes, all unarmored, have taken hits and survived.

The A-10 isn’t an air superiority fighter; it’s an attack craft and does that job well enough than any grunt on the ground is disappointed when a request for air support is answered by anything BUT an A-10.

Grunts have no clue. Literally, they listed the A-10 having a copilot as a reason why they prefer it.As in they misidentify aircraft as the A-10.

The A-10 also only did that during low-intensity, counterinsurgency operations. Against infantry with technical. The M-61 is perfectly capable of destroying technicals. Go lookup a video of it in action and tell me it’s not capable and you need the GAU-8.

Yes it can do the job, it doesn’t do it better than multirole fighters that you are going to have anyways. It actually does it worse. It was restricted to 20nmi from the border in Desert Storm during day time. It was assigned to destroy enemy vehicles with standoff munitions from medium altitude, to keep it safe from AAA. Meanwhile F-16 did low level attacks with unguided bombs on SAM units that had organic AAA defenses.

In any case the US has a huge military budget so wasting money on the A-10 is not an issue.

That’s not the F-35’s role, that’s the F-16’s role for the USAF (and most western air forces) and carries as much ordinance, has better range since it’s not hampered by armor.

It also actually has performed low-level attacks against AAA, something the A-10 was banned from doing in Desert Storm, despite having armor for that specific task.

Which is the issue, the A-10’s core concept is flawed. Armor does not provide suitability to aircraft, not even against AAA, never mind SAMs. Compromising performance (speed, range), forgoing capabilities (A2A radar) makes the plane practically useless.

The Army wants to keep them. F-35s can’t do the A-10’s job properly, and the A-10 has a reputation. However, they are old with no replacement even in the works because the Air Force only wants bombers or fighters.

Which job is that? Killing hiluxes and insurgents with no air defense capabilities? Because against everybody else the A-10 throws stand-off munitions from medium altitude, when it’s not banned from entering hostile airspace.

It’s no coincidence nobody wants to operate it. Not any foreign air force, not USAF that is stuck with it and not the US army that was offered it(they are fine with USAF paying for it).

F-16s can do anything useful the A-10 can and much more.

Look a non-Trumpist American. Every bit as rabid as the Magats.

And if this was your childhood fave, I’m jk.

Oh no, you are not getting off that easily!! I am still raging impotently at my phone with a frothing mouth!

100% correct on the greek part!

Greek:

Παρακαλώ στοιβάχτε τις καρέκλες στο τέλος της ημέρας.

Or simply dementia.

Because not only the donors but a big part of the Dem’s base, even here on lemmy that is an outlier, are pro-war.

Iran has a population of 90 million. How many people do you think have died to make a significant difference?

They would be shot to death by Hungary’s military. Or any other member state’s where applicable. The EU is not a (federal) state and there is no popular support for becoming one.

Orban might be a piece of shit but that does not justify making the EU a state and forcibly taking sovereignty away from members.