• 0 Posts
  • 71 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 7th, 2024

help-circle




  • dev_null@lemmy.mltoNeurodivergence@beehaw.orgNot "Appropriate"
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    A teacher gave us the definition of biotechnology in primary school, something like “using living organisms to make products or services”.

    I asked if ploughing a field with a horse-drawn plough is biotechnology and was told off for having a piss. It was a genuine question and I still don’t know.


  • Great summary! Here is the other side of the debate:

    • The backpack is overengineered and spares no expense in materials and durability, making it expensive. It is not overpriced. It may be unreasonably costly and not worth the purchase. The reason being it costs a lot to manufacture, not because it’s overpriced.

    • Linus was stupid in his “no warranty needed” claim, as most people won’t (and shouldn’t) take his word for it. Nevertheless, it is true his store always replaced items without issue and continues to do so, warranty or not. The customer experience is generally much better than the average store, where you may have to fight for your warranty claim only for it to be refused anyway. This is what he meant. If stores are not honoring warranties, and his store is accepting returns without a warranty anyway, then what’s the piece of paper worth anyway? But people like the piece of mind it provides, they learned the lesson and are providing it now. Of course the warranty never mattered either way.

    • I did buy the backpack. Months later I received a replacement set of zippers. There is nothing wrong with the original zippers, they just felt these ones are better and people who bought the backpack before the change should get them too. This has never happened to me with another purchase in my life, where the store decided to upgrade it for free and ship it to another continent for free, without me asking.

    • Months later they discovered the material used for the backpack floor isn’t what they wanted. So they offered me (and all purchasers) a full refund and additional store credit. Nobody noticed the issue, nobody asked for refunds. They discovered it and offered refunds proactively, even though it’s a non-issue. Again never happen in my life with another purchase.

    • Shitty for the employee to shit on GN. Commendable for Linus to stand by his employee publicly instead of blaming him.

    • You are correct they had lot of quality issues. It is also worth mentioning their overhaul that happened after that, improved processed, slowed down upload cadence, and the formation of volunteer “beta tester” viewers who watch videos pre-release to find errors not found internally. Good for them to try to improve.

    • Auctioning off the prototype cooler was quite egregious! As usual Linus took the heat on himself and never named the responsible employee who misallocated the cooler in their inventory.

    • A third party investigation found the sexual harassment allegations unfounded. Due to the nature of this we might never know the details though.

    • Linus invited Naomi to meet him in the meeting rooms of his hotel’s lobby, which exist specifically for business meetings. She later untruthfully misrepresented it as an invite to his hotel room.

    • In general, the transparency at which their business operates makes it very easy to point out flaws. I think it’s better than the opaque businesses where this can’t happen.

    • I agree with these of your points I didn’t address.

    Hope this provides both sides for readers, and thanks again.


  • They were used as example heuristics by Google marketing when they launched the checkbox reCaptcha. They were just simple to understand things for marketing purposes, but in reality Google checks many different signals and isn’t based on mouse movements. But people keep repeating the example from the ad.











  • dev_null@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mllaughing ass off at hacks
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Wut? Are you serious? You’re just going to boil down an entire artform to that? That’s an unbelievably reductive opinion.

    That’s kind of the point, isn’t it? People might spend a lot of time learning the different AI tools, how to supplement them with post processing and manual edits, how to combine them and how to nudge them in the direction they want, and then spend countless evenings trying to get the result they want. And people are going to say “they just AI generated it, they are not artists”, just like people might say photographers are not artists, they just take a photo.

    But we know it’s far from “just” taking a photo or “just” generating it with AI. Sure, you can “just” do both, but the result will be far from real art without all the preparation and extra work.

    But it’s easy to take a random shitty AI image to laught at, just like it’s easy to take a random shitty photo.