They don’t fit in his luggage (or would be smashed) so that’s the easiest way to take them onboard. Maybe purchased as gifts to relatives.

Check if it’s signed with the developer signature, that’s the only way to verify authenticity

They know. But many people will look at the screw, see it’s some weird thing they don’t have a screwdriver for, and decide to take the car to an authorized dealership instead of trying to repair an issue themselves.

Some will just buy the special screwdriver. But that doesn’t matter, what’s important is that some won’t, and the line goes up. You also have to look at it as yet another small barrier to repairability. It’s not stopping you by itself, but every single barrier adds up and stops more people.

It’s often implemented with JavaScript, yes

I love it, it’s smaller than both PNG and JPEG while better looking than both.

Yeah, which is what I said. It’s great, but an alternative solution is an alternative solution. If someone is sharing a file to a group with Airdrop, you are not receiving it with localsend.

Localsend doesn’t support Airdrop.

Which is great, but it doesn’t solve the interoperability problem of being able to AirDrop files between someone’s iPhone/MacBook and your Linux/Android

Drugs are technology

No you can’t. The only way to turn off PRs on a public repo is to migrate away from GitHub.

He made a comment in a discussion, as can anyone. People disagree with his comment. Intervention my ass, all he did is express his opinion, which everyone is free to ignore.

What’s black mirror-like about better screens?

What does that have to do with the article though? The technology in question is not intended for implants.

What are you guys talking about, what eyeball, what computer in a lens? This is supposed to be a new display technology for smart glasses or VR headsets.

And yet FUTO clearly attempt to keep up a false image of being the good guys, which doesn’t seem like openly being the bad guys.

By that logic the word “openly” is meaningless.

says he isn’t a thief

Well that’s the entire issue, isn’t it? If he says he isn’t a thief, then he’s a thief who clearly isn’t open about it. Just like Mike isn’t openly a nazi, he’s just a nazi who’s lying about not being one.

Exactly my point, and yet the commenter claims FUTO do that, even though they obviously aren’t, because who would.

Try Ente Photos, I like it more.

Do words mean anything anymore? That is an argument for them being fascists. But how are they “openly” fascist? Where is their statement, where they openly state “we are fascists”?

Because they might be, but I don’t think they ever openly said so.