His graph is still valid, as the exponential growth doesn’t really matter if we start from 0 BCE or 10000 BCE.
Even if we would loose 60% of the population now, we would still be 1.5 times the population of 1900 (9miljard x 0.4=3.6 >2)
the best thing that could have happened to Ukraine.
And therefore the world
“Mishandling migration” is a pessimist position. With this position you can be wrong all the time, and then when an event occurs that false in the pessimistic view “you” claim full victory. It is similar to the story of doctors and a terminal patient that keeps outliving the diagnosis (although doctors dont celebrate the moment thay are proven right).
For example why “populist concerns” are not to be taken too seriously are football hooligans. True (white) nationals tearing down city centres, yet you don’t hear anything about “bad integration” or “religion of peace”, or any conversation from that corner.
Lol you knob, go do something about your politics instead of “warning smug Europeans” on a obscure forum
The root of the problem is the baby boom, not the restabilization of the populace
*despite suspect being far right
Your examples are with small enough numbers that indeed it can also be written out. Now if you please, write out 7.45•10^16
Please learn to exponent. 20 • 10^33^ So much more clear
It takes zero effort to be explicit. It would also lessens the misinformation potential.
Nice way of being racist; brown people can’t attend a private school huh…
This article really requires a “white boy” before all the brits start burning hotels with refugees again
Cheese
Oranges all year round. A heated house, lit after dark. Spices.
The US has the safest aviation record in the world.
Food not Bombs
It’s all a simple misunderstanding really. You see the Israelis read from right to left.
Can you Yanks just piss the fuck off. There is zero need to make this about you. 62 fatal shootings is a a tragedy with fighting against
Go ahead and downvote me.
I got you bro
Sure, we don’t have 100% efficient energy storage, but we certainly have technology that does the job.
We only need about 40% overall efficiency to beat the theoretical limit of fossil fuel counterparts.
Can we face a rule that the country must be in the title if the post?
Not world news worthy article