Though this is a severe exploit, note that you need already user access to the machine to use it.
Dor like … Everyone here who learns from it cis this need it’s likely a non issue. Still good practice to fix but if you didn’t share your user space this will not be the attack vector you will fall victim to - most likely.
That’s sich a Mac answer it’s unbelievable.
Describing “A project aimed to be agnostic of it’s environment” as a design mistake and not a inherent flaw of the OS is… Just wow.
Remember in this thread it’s about the pro and con of Macos as interference hardware. This is a major flaw which comes baked into the hardware. I tested it and find it an unacceptable limitation. It’s important for others to know.
To state “containerization is the issue” though… Just wow.
Depends what you want to do… For example I didn’t get python whisper in a container to run on Mac in any way that can be called “performance” and I don’t want my dev workflow to optimize for an OS I despise :D
“here’s someone who fucked up big time. We report it and there are these consequences”.
This isn’t even about war performance at all?
This got way longer than expected but the tldr is: foreign exchange is super complex and depends on a lot of factors which don’t matter to you as money user. I tried to give a few examples below.
Plus: You’re mixing up two very different concepts:
Fiat evaluation and purchasing power.
First, money;
“More worth” is a natural instinct but doesn’t reflect how the money market works: it’s a question of how much of that money is in circulation as well for example:
1107650 CHF Million 19396,90 USD Billion
(Source tradingeconomics.com ).
So while it’s the CHF is slightly over value when compared one to one the picture is different when you look at total money available. Then you look at production capacity, glue creation and supply and demand for those currencies. All of this will flow into the price.
The minimum wage discussion is a completely different one: here you need to compare minimum wage to the purchasing power of the area you are looking at and take into consideration how the tax and financial situation changes to be able to compare it.
There’s for example concept called big Mac index which is a crude way of showing the difference: how much does MacDonald’s charge for their bullshit? They are everywhere and quite good at finding a acceptable local price.
If you want to dive deeper a key word to look for is the Gini Index with which the wealth distribution is quantified. I’m not good enough to explain it well though.
Now for the colors: design of money is the job of the nations (or unions) main bank to decide usually. The US seem to have the creativity of a washed down rock while others are more creative.
The Euro money for example is designed with guardrails by each member country but color, size and form are fixed and optimized to be easily recognized even with various visual impediments, which I personally really like.
Apparently the account got flagged, not even the repo itself.
By now I think they left the driver wheel to chatgpt and hope for the best.
It’s not connected. Don’t get me wrong I agree with your sentiment - but law doesn’t care about ethics or morale or anything.
“Public doctrine” is nothing they exists, legally. Toy are wasting bandwidth of change.org .
No the claim is dubious because it’s equalling “written on bank note” with “must be basis for legal discussions”.
Again: depends on the legal system that statement is not that easy in that generic form.
Ik specifically thinking about the situation in which a human no longer can communicate what they want:
In Germany there is the legal concept of transferring this kind of decision power in case you yourself are no longer able to do that. The “pulling the plug” situation: the individual can no longer state their wishes directly concerning the situation but left a binding document who has the decision power in their stead.
Now you could argue that this also is “the human has to want it” as they wanted the other person to have this life and death power.
As someone else said: helping humans find a dignified death is legal in some countries.
Your second point is more complicated though: I don’t know the laws in a lot of countries but where I’m from animals are strictly treated as property - emotional connection isn’t taken into strong consideration at all when it comes to assessing their value when it comes to legal fights but they are treated like a distinct thing different from both humans and objects in a lot of other cases (e.g. dedicated laws like “unnecessary” animal cruelty is forbidden ).
About the reason you can discuss as much as you want, the two arguments I’ve stumbled across are:
there must not be a distinction in terms of value because that value must be purely subjective and cannot be assessed.
There is no objective way to classify animals based on emotional connection and therefore the law can’t create categories.
Culturally we treat animals like different to humans all the time - even your dog is not treated “family” to the extreme a child would (think of child protection laws and what that would mean if they’d apply to a dog or a hamster). And now expand this to find a definition which covers both a cow someone has as a beloved pet or a meat animal.
Note that I’m trying to not say wether this is “right” or “wrong”: morale categories and laws have some overlap but they are quite lose as soon as you get specific.
My primary source was an interview with a judge who went into an hour long discussion about how complex the relation between animals and the law is and how “emotional connection” and the need for the law to be objective and repeatable are an inherent contradiction.
In short:
It’s a very tough question because there isn’t the one correct answer. Law, morality and personal subjectivity collide and make a mess out of us.
Thanks for sharing! Even before finishing it:
Fuck the haters-on-principle, an awesome person created something that changes a life for better. It can’t get more human centric than this.
To me that’s a prime example what GenAI can be used for: closed use case, no need (nor promise) to expand and an awesome purpose by the creator.
I dug around a bit in the codebase and I’d be surprised if he’s a complete layman though. There is a visible difference between AI parts in the mini games and hand crafted/corrected stuff ( “// commented out for production” ). Still highly impressive to me!
Hey,
Person here who despises electron apps in part because of the memory footprint and in part because I don’t like neither chromium nor node.js - personal preference mainly.
From your description I have the feeling that it’s unclear to your user base if electron is set or up to debate. There is only a thin line between “explaining” and “defending”.
In terms of communication: “We’re using electron as foundation because it allows us to focus on development. We’ve considered alternatives like Tauri and XYZ and opted in favor of electron.”
If there are situations that might make you rethink state those as well (“if someone provides a proof of concept via XYZ that an alternative is faster by y% while enabling us to still use (your core libraries and languages) we might consider a refactor.”
If you’d engage with me after an electron rant on your codebase you’d just raise my hope that I might change your mind! Don’t give people hope, don’t feed the trolls and do your thing!
Just please be honest with yourself: your app doesn’t use “50 to 60 MB”, it uses 500MBish on idle because of your choice. And that’s okay as long as you as developer say that it is.
Thanks, friend! I really like the intention ❤️
What do you mean, “open source only”?
I mean it’s a collection I could stand behind in most parts - but from Signal over Vivaldi, Proton, etc. I’d eyeball about a fourth are not FOSS.
Why not be proud on the degoogled part and the conscious choices you made instead of adding hashtag spammed missinfo?
The answer is a clear yes.
In short: Choose your tool that will suit you throughout your degree and really dig into it and learn it now while doing your paper.
Long version:
This is absolutely common and I’m not aware of a text editor which supports footnotes but doesn’t support automatically numbering and referencing.
In latex there’s actually a \footnote that takes care of that. In libre office, if I recall correctly, it’s Insert -> Footnote and I’m sure there are templates with the proper formatting and font sizing already in place.
Now it sounds like you’re quite early in your higher degree career - depending on your goals and future challenges you might want to either go the easiest route or really dig into writing-based formatting: It’s just faster if you’re typing all the time to not switch to a mouse to inert footnotes - but only if your really used to it.
Opencloud is the was to go from the established systems in my opinion. https://github.com/opencloud-eu
File sharing and -management for me has a higher level of trust and stability requirements. Syncin with four developers and “doing everything” while based on typescript makes me suspicious - but I haven’t tried it hands-on.
Traefik and caddy were mentioned, the third in the game is usually nginxproxymanager.
I’m using both traefik and nginx in two different setups. The nginxproxymanager can be configured via UI natively which makes checking configurations a bit easier.
Traefik on the other hand is configured easily within the compose itself and you have everything in one place.
This turned out to be tiresome though if you don’t have a monolithic compose file - that’s actually even hr history why I switched to npm in the first place.
I don’t have any experience with caddy so can’t provide anecdotal insights there.
I really like it already so take this as an alternative, not as improvement:l. I don’t have a good eye for aesthetics anyway don’t his is more about structure.
Personally I switched from a single dashboard to purpose driven hubs - I can’t imagine a situation where I need my infrastructure and my calendar at the same time regularly for example.
Another point is context typing: your release checker is quite far away from your appointments and calendar. It looks to me to be sorted by content rather then function (i.e. it’s entertainment so it’s next to YouTube). The same is true for your interaction patterns. There is a lot of visual information which I’m sure you’ll rarely interact with but instead consume. And then there are clearly external links, both bottom left (opencloud, tooling) and top right (external media) in addition to your own self hosted content.
My suggestion is therefore a process instead of a change: Note down when you consume which features of this awesome dashboard together for a few days. Then restructure the content of the whole dashboard based on your usage patterns - either as a new Monolith or even experimenting with splitting it.
I even suggest using a different medium then your usage device (if it’s a desktop PC mainly use pen and paper, if it’s your laptop use your phone, if it’s your phone you use this dashboard on then you might have different problems :D)
You don’t! At least not in the sense that I’m aware of the JADE thing:
JADE is nothing that is a strong work proven topic but came from social media to handle narcissistic people as a peer group.
Your reactions are hostility and rejection based and how I understand you it’s your nerves that you want to preserve.
For this in a professional work place there are multiple ways to deal with and even all of them at the same time, just from the top of my head:
Hope this helps a bit!
So it generates about 18 Watts of power while transmitting.
Impressive!