Bottom left cat has orange legs and a black head

Scusi what the fuck is that mouse? Does it even have USB?

Well yes of course it is, how do you recon we get all these inside info?

In the case of the EU however as well as a bunch of European countries, DEI is literally part of the constitution. But hey, Dump and his team would need to inform themselves on other countries to know that

In German penal law there were discussions on how to treat those that act under orders. Many Germans did act under orders and even in accordance to law in WW2 but also in regard to the Mauerschützen (the soldiers that shot dissidents at the inner German border)- meaning that there were difficulties persecuting them as it was technically legal. There were way too few persecutions, however something called the Radebrechtsche formula was developed. Paraphrasing it says, something that is morally wrong to every morally thinking being cannot be legalized or excused. It is simply illegal to act on orders that are naturally wrong.

Pls do, but we don’t take that shit stain back

I think your assumption is partly true, the other part being that they do not care if the economy goes to shit as that would just leave them with more to blame on the other parties.

That worked for a few years, the AfD wants Germany to return to the Deutsche Mark. That would basically be the end of the German economy, but yeah patriots and all that

Weirdly though while that is still very much an authotarian system, it will always be a hard break on any too unhinged ideas of populism. It simply is not in the interest of the Elite.

That isn’t meant to be an excuse, but it will mostly prevent the hateful or ignorant to grasp the majority of power and change the state beyond the point of no return. The point we fear might be passed soon in the USA, as well as Italy, Germany, Austria and all other countries where the far-right populists are on the rise, without being kept in check

What do you want? The ministers for foreign and inner affairs have both stated that they would obviously comply by the law and would have Netanjahu arrested. He has not come to Germany though, so what is it you want? Have a spec ops team invade Israel and arrest him?

One of my first thoughts about Musk’s support for the AfD was that maybe we can trick these idiots into buying Teslas. That at least would be good for the environment

Hugo Boss didn’t Design any uniforms, they just made them

https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/donald-trump-olaf-scholz-aussenpolitik-us-beziehungen-li.3186099

Basically, outwardly hey there new president, we’ll play it cool right? Pretty pls? Meanwhile, the German ambassador to the US: I do not have any fucking clue how far they will destroy the constitution, but it will be horrible. Meanwhile the German economy: 5 percent chance of all going well, 95 percent it will hurt or the worlds economy is going to be in shambles.

So yeah, not much actual enthusiasm here

There are a lot of important standards. The hight of a door lever, a light switch or an average stair for example.

Deinen Link, den du vollkommen außerhalb des Kontexts gepostet hast?

Oh we did - by basically sitting on our hands

Zu viel Brokkoli geraucht? Oder gab es Whataboutism im Sonderrabatt

This is becoming more of a clusterfuck every passing day

It only sounds complex and the workings are intricate. But the constitution is relatively straightforward in this regard. Germany uses a codified law system after all and its constitution is relatively new by comparison

There’s virtually no crime that can be physically redeemed, except for property crimes. Literally any other criminal offense creates an irredeemable injury. But that is exactly why nearly developed country, except for the USA have a redemption-type penal system. How do you measure redemption? Is r*pe redeemed after 4 or 50 years? It will never be for the victim.

But what you can do is try to help everyone to not become criminal again. Because for one, guess what, they’re human too. They weren’t born criminal and aren’t criminal by nature once they’ve committed a crime. They have the right to live their life as much as the guy they killed. Once you have them forfeit their right to a free life, you commit a similar crime. One that in this case is done by objectifying them as an object rather than a subject.

This thinking is the result of hundreds of years of philosophical thinking and seeing the result of your mindset being used by tyrannys.

If they do not pose a danger to anyone anymore and have reformed then they are to be let go. Also in dubio pro reo.

As for minors, their mind is still developing, they may have cognitively known that killing someone is wrong, but they have not yet accepted it as their own moral. Not knowing even the basics of cognitive development of children, I feel like there’s not even a point to discuss with you