Yeah - supposed to be the pinnacle

My favourite (northern?)mid western saying is «uff da»

You guys…

I do like it though and we ran a cluster for lab at work for a year or so

Linux knowledge is broader, especially since truenas went core. For most enthusiasts Linux gives more Google answers than bsd ones. Also the gui is harder to install for non paying users. Linux is even got gamers these days

👍

So any language is good as I can make great software using it?? IMO js is still a mess and NPM is really full of shit code to prove it.

So uptime kuma being written in JS proves what about the language?

90% of the worst software and websites are made in js

They have balls?

Yeah - that’ll scare them. Nice guys marching in a predetermined area at a predetermined time

We live in a society

Goweff department - not doge. Why let him spit on doge and use that name?

Depends on what you’d want. A dockerfile defines how the image is built. If you want to mimic this then you need scripts.

But I think you could benefit from learning how docker works from the ground up if you want to recreate docker inages in lxc.

Better use is a dedicated docker host (a vm) and run your non-docker on lxc. Treat lxc as a minimal vm for one ( or a few) services/apps per lxcontainer

That depend on how much work you have to do to keep it working.

Let’s take a fairly common webserver like Caddy. Now you can install this through docker, or natively on linux.

If the app only exists as docker image then it cones down to your ability or recreating what the dockerfile does to get it installed on your lxc container.

Fun fact: early editions of docker used lxc for its containers.

Lastly there is podman that some people love for container management. It’s not my cup of tea, but it might fit you.

Install on a vm though, not lxc

Backup of docker would either be full host - for a simple and inflexible setup, or you do data and config backup (volumes mounted in docker), and rely on docker rebuilding the images.

This last type is more overhead in configuration of backup, but you can restore your containers on any host, individually

There are big differences between these two technologies. LXC is closer to a virtual machine than a docker setup. You could mimic most of a dockerfile if you wanted, but it’s not a replacement.

Most of us will use a mix og docker-hosts(vm’s running docker) and lxc. Reasons for this is that some stuff is easier to maintain in docker as it’s the preferred release channel.

You can also move vm’s to other datacenter hosts if needed - and with shared storage this is quick and mean no downtime. Lxc are stuck on the host.

So someone is paying - theres allways a cost

Like most things in life theres no free cpu cycles. They all have a cost somehow

Much of your choice of moves comes down to your partner.

In a place where dancing happen people are usually helpful and know more than basics, so i’d not say unprompted. Dancing is about promoting.