

It’s similiar to 9/11.
If it happened, it would be blowback from what the government has been doing abroad.
It can be both of those things: a cause for valid anger, and consequence of government actions.


It’s similiar to 9/11.
If it happened, it would be blowback from what the government has been doing abroad.
It can be both of those things: a cause for valid anger, and consequence of government actions.


You think it’s better off in the hands of a former Isis guy where they’re murdering Druze and other ethnic minorities while Israel has basically free reign to bomb, displace, and take land? It hasn’t become more stable after the fall brother.


Is Iraq better off now without Sadam? Is Syria better off now without Bashar? Is Libya better off now without Gadafi?
I don’t like any of those previous leaders, but every single case the country was worse off after. The same will be true of Iran.


I would love it if the Iranians had another revolution on their terms. However, you’re naive as hell if you think that would happen without western meddling. It’s already the root cause for most of the material conditions that cause these grievances.
Sanctions isolate Iran and actively hurt the common people. Israel and the US are constantly threatening, attacking, and doing espionage meaning the government is in constant threat and has to be more authoritarian to survive. The whole reason for the revolution was the people getting pissed at the Shah, our western puppet from before.
This has been a decades long project that you are being suckered into cheering for.


Nah, you can be the next Syria, or have an American puppet in place to syphon off the country’s wealth.


Describe how or it’s just copium


Well, the trajectories of both align with the content.


I voted PSL actually.
Also you don’t know this is the lesser pain option, a second time line is conveniently imaginary.


She was tripping over herself to say she was just like Biden, throating Liz Cheney, and saying we will have “the most lethal military” while her administration starves bombs and starves a population of mostly refugee children. Telling her base to shut up and let her talk.
Why aren’t you angry at her for being dogshit?


No, not voting is not voting, and the democrats in power are just polite fascists.
You will never have me vote in the affirmative for a genocide, and plenty of others agree. Maybe demand the bare fucking minimum from your representatives.


That’s a funny way to say: associated herself strongly with the genocide president and said how we were going to have the most lethal military in the world.
But sure it was the laugh.
Edit: liberals so insanely scratched below.


They’re dogs and vassals of the empire. Of course they aren’t biting the hand that feeds.


Four years old but it’s pretty relevant to the question. https://youtu.be/uD8N4JQy7cw
Corporations want one thing, profits.
If you can make profit by enslaving people, cutting corners with health and safety standards, and polluting the environment, they will. If they don’t, they’ll get “out competed” by the companies that do and drive the “inefficient” companies out of business. Then we get monopolization which we can’t do anything about because that’s regulation.
Using government issued currency? Is it still capitalism then?
So you’re OK with corporations having the power over your life instead? Just allow them to pollute your drinking water or allow them to put whatever they want in your food? You want to try those things?
Please define pure capitalism
Don’t use any, and figure out any interfaces or types you don’t have. Have a modocum of discipline to add the compile time safety


In a kind of way? Our material conditions are a large factor in our development and decision making ability.
This almost gets into “do we even have free will?” territory which is a hell of a question.
Maybe all the sanctions on the country cutting it off from basically everyone else has something to do with it, assuming it’s even true.