One question: Would you say the same about getting completely naked in public?

It is against the law. That means that society, as a whole, has decided that this is immoral.

No one forces you to stare at the girl

So that means that its morally okay to kill everyone who looks at me (“No one forces then to look at me!”)?

Why is your ethics enforceable, but other people’s aren’t?

Because ethics are only enforcable through laws and the laws currently enforce “my” ethics in that regard.

Why does she have less right to practice her ethical choice to expose her body (assuming by your answer you would have offense)?

Whether that is morally right is an ethical question but would you say the same about a minor (exposing themselves)?

Ethics is very subjective

Exactly, so what is the issue with the company having moral concerns about it and shutting it down?

They are not taking away any money from the existing funds. And that is the important thing IMO. Rather, they are using that large amount of money and investing it (safely) so that they generate surplus money that they use. Hiwever, they arent taking away money that is currently there.

They are just using the interests that this frozen capital generates and using that (instead of continuing to pay the interests to the Russians).

The US government doesn’t want an adversary government to have the data of its citizens (because of varios reasons, including mass manipulation for example). They would of course have no issue with having that data themselves though (also because then they would be more in control over how the data is handled).

Perhaps their stack is on Windows 2005 Server

But not for a foreign government (from their perspective).

I was actually not aware of that… Makes more sense now.

Except I have cups in my kitchen that are double the size of other cups and I dont know which ones to use.

Thats probably more of a correlation though. Like, the drivers that leave that much space are probably doing so only because they know they arent paying attention. If they were paying attention, a 2s distance would be safer.

7 seconds means they didnt have a full bladder. A minute means they stopped somewhere in between or you didnt count correctly.

Every time, a good 75% of people stand up before it’s allowed and it annoys me every time.

11-20 = -9 10-19 = -9 -9 = -9

Fixed that for you.

A 3rd party votes subtracts one vote from Biden’s total vote count, so to say. Here is the 1M$ math equation you desire (assuming you would usually vote for Biden):

Definitions:

(I) VoteDifference = VotesTrump - VotesBiden

(II) VotesBiden1 = EveryoneElsesVotes + YourVote (Scenario where you vote for Biden)

(III) VotesBiden2 = EveryoneElsesVotes (Scenario where you vote for a 3rd party)

Calculations:

(II) VotesBiden1 = EveryoneElsesVotes + Yourvote =〉VotesBiden1 - YourVote = EveryoneElsesVotes (III) VotesBiden2 = EveryoneElsesVotes =〉VotesBiden1 - YourVote = VotesBiden2

(I) VoteDifference = VotesTrump - VotesBiden

VoteDifference1 = VotesTrump - VotesBiden1 VoteDifference2 = VotesTrump - VotesBiden2

=〉VoteDifference2 = VotesTrump - (VotesBiden1 - Yourvote) =〉VoteDifference2 = VotesTrump + YourVote - VotesBiden1 (!!!)

THUS WE CONCLUDE:

In scenario 2 (which is the one in which you vote for a 3rd party), the vote difference (which determines who won and by how much), is EQUIVALENT to one additional person voting for Trump. You’re welcome. I don’t even need the 1.000.000$.

Or people were just more mature than you were back in highschool.

What the fuck is wrong with people?

Why do people care? Well, why do you close the door to the bathroom? Why dont you send me a picture of yourself right now (“What could I do with it anyway”?)

Some people care more about privacy than others. And most people simply don’t know where all their data really goes.

This is just a question. WTF

Would you think the same if the dad had told his buddy “500k € for the website”?

Lots of websites with menus on the left!

Can you send an example? I’ve only seen these foldout side bar menus.

No, you tried shifting the discussion and when I told you what was being discussed, you simply said you’re uninterested.

First, you’re taking the U.S. at its word that there was anyone on its side in real danger.

No I’m not. I never claimed anyone was in danger.

Second, it’s laughable to take the premise of additional intelligence possibly endangering some spy and turning that into “this would kill all U.S. spies.”

Yeah it is and nobody did. I certainly didnt.