• 7 Posts
  • 1.12K Comments
Joined 6 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 31st, 2020

help-circle

  • Ephera@lemmy.mltoOpen Source@lemmy.mlPlasma 6.7
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Yeah, it should come with the next Fedora release, which is scheduled for October 20th.

    Feature updates, like this new Plasma version, get shipped every half year on Fedora. In between, you mostly just get security and bug fixes…





  • Ephera@lemmy.mltoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldContinuwuity
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    Lots of folks also like the unmarketable names, because you know that it’s not a corporate project. You’re hearing about it, because it’s actually good, and not just because some startup got VC money to do marketing.

    Heck, the reverse is true as well. This project is better specifically because it has that name. You just know some transfemmes are tirelessly hacking away at it, because they enjoy the silly name.











  • Yeah, I always thought the typing thing was just people coming up with silly reasons, because they don’t like change, but when you do networking stuff, you actually need to type out IP addresses rather often.

    Either because you need to manually set a new address. Or because you can’t reach the device via network until you’ve typed in its IP address, so can’t copy-paste it then either.




  • AGPL is specifically for web services. For example, if Nextcloud were provided under the GPL, Amazon or the like could serve a modified version of Nextcloud without having to hand out their modifications. As far as the GPL is concerned, Amazon is the user and the software just happens to accept requests from the network.
    With AGPL, those who use the software over the network are also deemed users and therefore have the right to access the source code.



  • I imagine, it’s just too much of a niche and practically not enforceable anyways.

    You would need to somehow know that a web service is a using a modified version of your library, then you’d be able to demand those library changes to be open-sourced.

    And well, just in general, covering all kinds of niche use-cases isn’t terribly healthy for open-source licenses, because each modification is something that can be challenged in court and which might be incompatible with other licenses.
    Ultimately, a library under such a specialty license would probably not see much use either. You could only really depend on it in AGPL applications. And at some point, you do have to ask yourself, if it’s even useful to develop your library then.