• 1 Post
  • 81 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: September 30th, 2023

help-circle






  • Sounds like you’ve thought about this a bit so you’ll be fine. Everything you may need can be bought in route if necessary. Perhaps download offline maps for your navigation app in case you don’t have cell service.

    Maybe pack some healthy food? This is going to sound silly, but I like to buy small heads of green and purple cabbage and just eat the leaves raw while driving. It can keep you from buying junk at a gas station.

    You could do some worst case prep, like have a couple gallons of water in the car and other things to keep yourself alive and comfortable in case the car breaks down somewhere inconvienent. If you have time you can buy a roadside assistance plan from AAA or similar so you can get towed to a mechanic, but you very likely won’t need it.

    I’ve been driving for over 20 years and I’ve never had a car break down in route. Just make sure the tire pressure is fine, the tires aren’t shit, and there are adequate levels of engine oil and engine coolant. That’s all you can really do.









  • I can’t get past NYT’s paywall, and it’s the NYT, they’re not going to give an unbiased assessment, but I found the wikipedia article. I’m failing to see how China “took the port back.” Looks like a Chinese company bought an 85% stake into Hambantota International Port Group, an entity created by the Sri Lanken government to run the port. The agreement allows the Chinese company to operate the port for 99 years.

    Then there’s this bit:

    Writing in 2023, academic and former UK diplomat Kerry Brown states that China’s relationship to the Hambantota port has become the opposite of the theorized debt-trap modus operandi. Brown observes that China has had to commit more money to the project, expose itself to further risk, and has had to become entangled in complex local politics. As of at least 2024, the port is not a significant commercial success, although shipping through the port is increasing.


  • Okay gang, I need you to think a bit more critically than ‘China Bad.’ First, why was the term “debt collector” used? China lent money, now they’re taking payments. Is that debt collecting, or just the second part of lending money? Is a mortgage lender a debt collector? That’s a loaded term meant to give you a negative impression, cuz no one likes a debt collector except perhaps an American hospital.

    Second, the countries agreed to the loans. Paying them back was expected and predictable. If payments can’t be made, then the debt will be restructured, meaning the payment schedule will be modified so the debtor country can make payments.

    Third, the money was often used to build a potentially money-making asset, like a port. If used correctly, the assest should pay for a decent chunk of the loan.

    Forth, I see a lot of half baked comments like ‘China will take the port back’ or ‘China will take the hospital.’ You must first ask, with what will China take back an African port, or hospital, or whatever? They don’t have the means. They’re not going to park an aircraft carrier off the coast and drop bombs until the loan is repayed, because they can’t. So what does China want? China doesn’t want the fucking port, they want resources and friends with benefits.

    China’s basically going here’s a loan, build a port to import goods for your people. Import from whoever you like, it’s your port. Oh by the way we make the cheapest and best everything (cuz they do), we’d be happy to sell you whatever you want, like solar panels or EVs. We also need colbalt and the finest silicon sand to build you these awesome EVs and solar panels you want, so we’ll buy that from your mines and use your cool new port to ship it. Here’s the loan payment schedule. No payments for the first 5 years, then afterward you pay X per year for 20-30 years. Oh no, you’re having trouble making payments? Well we benefit from you having that port too, so let’s restructure that debt so your people don’t revolt and get cozy with the US.

    There’s no fucking debt trap. That’s just racist and moronic. ‘Those sneaky Chinese tricked the backwards brown people with a loan they can’t repay.’ Plus you can’t repossess a structure on the other side of the world without a credible threat of violence. China does not have the means. Economic coercion, sure, but the debtor agreed to that and they’re not stupid.