Of the internet? Probably not. Of the independent internet? Maybe.

Given previous more or less similar projects this is likely to get sued out of existence by Google.

Why would you not want containers managed by systemd?
You get the benefits of containerisation and you don’t have to learn the arcane syntax of some container engine or another.

The ActivationPolicy I added in an attempt to replicate what wg-quick produces, as I recall.

Do you notice anything wrong with my config? https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/30495

Do you notice anything wrong with my config? https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/30495

Oh, so it’s all about consent? Huh.

Rude

Memorisation isn’t the issue. I know their names and their relation to each other.
But unlike some birds I don’t simply see where North is.
I can make a rough estimate based on the position of the sun, if conditions allow.
But if I’m in the subway tunnels or just emerged I might as well spin in a circle and appoint a random direction North. It’s certainly not an intuition as it seems to be for some people.

The potato rested for 8 hours, the potato should get into gear or the potato is gonna be late for school.

I never learned how that happened. We suspected that someone might have sneakily applied them during production or before delivery, as the trains were brand-new.
I doubt they were “official” stickers 😉

When the Munich public transport introduced new trains around 20 years ago some of them had porn images stuck to the inside of legs of some of the benches. You can be sure that teenage boys find them.
The numbers quickly dwindled but it took the company years until they had them all removed.

To be fair, depending on how the hummus is seasoned, that might work quite well.

But why would you post a screenshot of the gallery displaying the photo if you can just upload the photo?

It’s a pain to get anything but MacOS to run on those damn things.

Why the /s? It’s true!

Not quite. The truth is what the facts are based on.
Take the speed of light in vacuum, for example. We don’t know its true value. We have measured it repeatedly, to high precision, using various different methods. Those measurements are or facts. Based on those facts we estimate the speed of light in vacuum to be 299,792,458 m/s. We are quite confident that this value is at least very close to the truth, sure to how many measurements we made and how close they’re bunched together.
But if in the future more precise measurements suggest that it’s in fact closer to 299,792,458.135 m/s then we’ll learn that we’ve been less correct before.

When the model in your head mirrors the observation. That’s truth.

That conclusion is unsupported. Only the facts are truth.
When your mental model matches your observations and makes accurate predictions about expected values for observations that indicates that your model is at least close to the truth.

However if you control the observations, you have to be careful not to introduce a bias. For example you might be tempted not to make certain observations that would falsify your model. Or you might be tempted to not make observations that would require you to expand your model. But in both cases you admit your model doesn’t match reality and what good is it at that point?

As I said, it depends on how you define truth. If it’s enough that people agree with you, your distance from the generally accepted truth can vary widely, depending on the donor of people you base it on. The fact that people agree with you doesn’t make something true on its own.
Effectively the question is: How reproducible do you want your truth to be?
If you only need your buddy to come to a similar truth you may not need to argue that much. But to convince a perfect stranger you will probably have to make your case properly. How did you arrive at your truth? Which conformable facts do you base it on? Which predictions does your claimed truth make, that might validate it?

That depends on how those people determined their beliefs to be true. And how you define truth.