*squints…*

Clinton?

Article calls them privateers… Then proceeds to not describe commerce raiding and that they’re (mostly) state-owned… Literally the two things that define what a privateer is.

I love the single open bandaid strapped to the lid.

Oh, this is going to be a fun thread!

You both completely miss the argument. Cile is strawmanning, vas is again viewing from the omniscient or opposing viewpoint.

Virtually all intolerants perceive themselves as victims. Permitting “intolerance of intolerance” is just accelerationist, “might makes right” ideology.

Unironically yes? Replacement theory, blood libel, global elitism… Whatever the angle, lots of -isms expouse roots in victimhood.

Edit: accidentally double posted

That view is fine and dandy with an an omniscient lens of who’s the reactionary intolerant and who is the originator of intolerance.

OMG… Thought this was a shop…

I’m so mad that there isn’t a link to more info about that, because I’m wracking my brains and I can’t think of any mechanism that makes sense.

Setting up for a string of “not real women” court cases? Enshrining that gay and lesbian victims don’t get the same justice het women will?

Can’t wait for crickets when a clearly discriminatory law ends up being a tool for discrimination.

You mean it’s not Scott Pilgrim rules?

If everybody you meet make is an asshole…

sweating in USA

No, they’ll probably push Hillary again.

The funny thing is that’s only a guess. They didn’t actually discuss silencers at all when they were passing the law.

I know I’m bad at a lot of things… It only takes practice and hard work to tell if I can develop beyond that.

And yet you used sand to transmute this missive into the aether. Curious!

Plus we can imbue crystals with thought and knowledge by inscribing them with complex runes and commanding them in a special language.

Really should have had more positive or neutral messaging, like “nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people - maybe there is. I don’t know.”