What is the strategic value in bombing schoolchildren intentionally? The goal is clearly to inflict harm on children, to bring death to children.

Lmao middle school philosopher here unironically posting a thought experiment as if it actually applies in the real world. No, the act of murdering everyone would create a near infinite rise in suffering as it progresses. Don’t post infantile takes on things that actually matter to the material world. Save it for your professor.

Lmao, not gonna happen. This isn’t your liberal safe space.

Yeah, this isn’t anything new. Literally centuries old analysis here. I guess it’s nice they updated it for the contemporary society, though.

I buy unbranded brand jeans, but I don’t think that’s it. I just like high quality selvage denim, lasts way longer than Levi’s or Wrangler and looks nicer too.

Sort of like how you’re an unpaid shill for the western empire

Same thing as the brown shirts being integrated into SS after Hitler was released from prison

I flew in 2024 most recently and had no such requirement. I wonder why the differing experience.

Have you been to China? They do none of this shit. They don’t gaf about your phone.

Because he’s lying. I travel to China regularly and they don’t give a fuck about my phone. Not once have they done more than just glance at my passport, glance at me, and stamp it and send me on my way.

No they don’t. Customs in China is like 2 seconds of them glancing at your passport, looking at you, and stamping it. Literally the fastest I’ve ever got through an airport is in China, both arriving and leaving.

Israel is recognized for using imprisonment as a form of hostage taking, holding thousands of Palestinians with no charges or trial for up to months at a time, as young as 8 years old. This is more of the same behavior for them. They were not in Israel until dragged there at gunpoint, they were in international waters, btw.

Django Reinhardt had pretty bad damage to his fretting hand too from a fire, and that dude shredded like no other.

I’d rather have a one party state under a communist party than a two party state under two capitalist parties. In both cases it’s immediately obvious who these parties serve, in China, it’s the people and society, in the U.S., it’s the billionaires and capitalist class.

They’re already in a union, this is China. All companies over a certain size are unionized by law.

You think they’re going to close all 38 of their bases across all of Europe? That would be a big strategic break from full spectrum dominance, which is US policy, and part of the plan to contain the growth of China.

The US would never give up its vassals in Europe for a single country.

You’re right, I was confusing it with them flying aid into Lebanon, the aid they’ve given to Palestine has been through Egypts crossing.

China frequently criticizes Israel, and has flown aid directly into Palestine. They’re a non-interventionalist nation, and have their own issues to work through, especially with the trade war ramping up and risks of a potential hot war. You want them to get themselves cut off from the global economy by attacking Israel or something?