Archangel

That is a very good point.

Did any of these people even try and explain to him how tariffs actually work…or was that a step too far?

He is the most healthy human being in all of history. No one is healthier or stronger than Donald Trump. He has the body of a 30 year old athlete and the mind of a genius.

So the trick to getting away with doing shit like this is to just be open about it? Weird. If that was the case, then why not give these Democrats a pass, as well? They aren’t exactly hiding it either.

Or are you just getting these four mixed up with the 200 others that didn’t support this legislation?

I’m fine calling out the 2% of Democrats that vote against their own constituents interests. But what I find hilarious, is the total lack of focus on the fact that 100% of Republicans are behind this.

This is what Chomsky was talking about when he wrote manufacturing consent. The framing here is massively deceptive, to the point of being completely backwards…and folks just eat it up this way. They swallow this narrative whole, and spit it back up for others to swallow.

So, even more evidence of insider trading? Too bad they cut funding to all the agencies responsible for dealing with this kind of corruption.

I love how they never once mention in the article that Republicans wrote the bill, proposed it, and 100% of them voted in favor of it.

But, despite all that…the headline still reads, “Democrats passed it”.

Consumers are the victims here. No one actually cares about their “feelings”.

So, Greenlanders…is this your price? A one-time $10k pay-off, to purchase your loyalty to the King of America?

Well, serves them right for getting married, then. /s

I love how they just casually admit that they’re “exploring ways” to break the law.

The Constitution does not support that school of thought. It is very clear, that the rights it affords are universal and apply to everyone in the country. It says nothing about being a citizen or not.

And he wonders why people hate him? smh.

I’m pretty sure the 1st amendment nullifies this argument.

Lend him a ton of money and then threaten to collect.

Well, yeah. It’s called “market manipulation”, and it’s usually considered illegal.

So…jail?

So, this is what “draining the swamp” is supposed to look like…right?

They aren’t really “struggling to explain it”, so much as “struggling to explain it, in a way that doesn’t imply market manipulation and insider trading”. Because that IS the only rational explanation for what he’s doing.

Buy low…sell high. Somebody’s making a killing off of all this chaos, and it ain’t us.