I mean, the solution is simple: Don’t use IP!
No Internet Protocol -> No Internet -> No slop
I mean, the solution is simple: Don’t use IP!
No Internet Protocol -> No Internet -> No slop


I mean, Bun itself serves a language that should not exist


Searching these devices produced no evidence relevant to the case. Nothing linked Klayme to the girl. No intimate images were found. Klayme did have a Kik account, but cops couldn’t even show that he had accessed the service during the period in question.
And then they want us to follow the law. Fucking fascists.


The trimonthly perchance post again.
We just need an autoban for posts containing “perchance”.
Worst. Movie. Ever!! Three out of five.


Never got a reponse so I just apply a workaround everyday


Afaik immich is generally safe to publicly expose. Otherwise, I’d just use http basic auth. Supported by every server and client, should be secure enough to hold off attacks in case immich’s login/auth mechanisms fail, and I don’t see a usecase where this wouldn’t work.
If you don’t have a public IP or need IPv4, get a 4€/Month VPS (cheaper than even a Pi’s energy usage I suppose) and put headscale on it.



Isn’t this ‘sharing an album’?
We and our 62894260215 Partners, including at least five modern versions of the SS, 35 Governments and the public, want the best for your privacy and security.


It’s obvious spam… I’d assume they’re deleted and banned asap, are they not?


When someone has multiple Clankers (“AI Agents”), you can synchronize/verify their so called “reasoning” or “thought process” (which is a total scam btw).
Nothing someone with a brain wants.


Granny is highly advanced and has actually planted a photoperiodic plant, so it won’t bloom outside but only in her growroom


The hardest thing is reputability. Which is solved by getting a good IPv4 provider.
For that reason, there should be a sysadmin in every call, who can just reboot the offenders machine


Yeah, with GECOS introducing the GECOS field, they normalized name verification, phone number verification, email address verification as well as location verification. So soon we should see those becoming mandatory and controlled.
Oh wait, that was 64 years ago, so by now we should already be in literally 1984, actually?! Or is it that no one actually gives a fuck about a handful of programs trying to read user data that no one set, and if they set it, set it to a nonsencial/false value without any component verifying anything?
The problem isn’t libraries adding more optional field to their capabilites, but management systems (such as a distros installer) making them mandatory against user will. That is what users should actually object to. No installer or component I know actually sets the location field. However, some are already planing to require the birth of date field, which is the actual start to pushing any boundaries. So start protesting there.
Or, if you actually think that simple standards for how user data is stored is already malicious verification, your only option is probably, unironically, TempleOS, as even DOS stores user information, Country + TZ, available for other programs to fetch.
LUKS header disk emergency destroy button? *boop!
cuts through limb
If it bleed it’s real, if the video stops abruptly or the knife doesn’t actually cut, it’s slop