Facts:

• POTUS45 knew it was a one-time grift so there are no repercussions for him for abandoning his electorate.
• POTUS45 repeatedly stated his desire to help Israel and not even once hinted at idea of peace for Gaza.
• Haris clearly was trying to evade direct answers to Gaza questions which left significant room for after-election change
• Democrats suck (at messaging, at fighting back and at playing hard ball)
• Putting up ultimatums in the middle of election is doomed to failure. I can’t recall one instance where it was successful. I can recall however when existing administration, outside of election cycle, yielded to public pressure…

so with just more obvious facts on the table the entire notion of giving Dems middle finger and literally helping Republicans win was not merely misguided but malicious. Being surprised by the outcome does not speak highly of people involved and their priority. If their priority was stopping the bloodshed they would’ve acted differently, by all means that priority was mainly middle finger to Dems.

I am acutely aware that people are dying and between two administrations the difference is at what scale and whether public has any sway with administration. Present choice out of the gate pointed for larger scale suffering and no public input.

US elections are not pragmatic - they are spectacle of emotions, which is why public elects showman.