Has it grown like people have kept predicting? or is this peak lemmy? Did Peak Lemmy already happen?

  • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 months ago

    Personally I think growth is a tainted metric. For a capitalist enterprise focused on shareholder value it might be worth something (although you could argue that’s what turned the corporate Internet to shit in the first place). Steady ingress and egress of users is fine IMO. We don’t need growth, we just need stability.

    • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      It depends, without some growth in the beginning all the niche communities where one person keeps posting for month and others just consume this person will grow tired of being the only one posting. Then those smaller communities will die and we will have shrinking instead of stagnation. The big communities will grow and the users will get centralized. But overall the whole Threadyverse will shrink.

      It’s like when you have a conversation with someone and you are the only one carrying the conversation.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Exactly, key focus should be on sustainability. As long as there are enough people to develop the platform, run instances, and post content, then Lemmy will be around indefinitely. There’s absolutely no rush to grow in my opinion. A slow and steady ingress of users results in people adjusting to Lemmy norms, where a flood of users risks changing the culture entirely.