alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 年前More confusion for recruiterssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up1127arrow-down16
arrow-up1121arrow-down1imageMore confusion for recruiterssh.itjust.worksalphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 年前message-square7fedilink
minus-squarecalcopiritus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up26·1 年前Make it strongly statically typed. Dictionaries and lists must have all their items of the same type. For extra confusion.
minus-squaredwraf_of_ignorance@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-21 年前Even betterer: make it MOP(Monad Oriented Programming). IYou pray to a supreme being monad till your program works.
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 年前And tuples should have the same types inside. And dictionary keys should have the same type as that dictionary’s values 😈
Make it strongly statically typed. Dictionaries and lists must have all their items of the same type. For extra confusion.
Even better: make it purely functional
Even betterer: make it MOP(Monad Oriented Programming). IYou pray to a supreme being monad till your program works.
And tuples should have the same types inside. And dictionary keys should have the same type as that dictionary’s values 😈