• CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Yep. They’re probably better than anyone at making a complex system with literal moving parts that works 100% of the time, the first time. On a nearly unlimited budget, with a decades-long schedule. In an institution and culture that’s now a been around a lifetime, staffed with top-notch people.

    That’s all perfect for what NASA does, but I wouldn’t recommend a management system that NASA uses to just anyone, just 'cause “da astronauts” use it. Not any more than I’d recommend drinking your own distilled piss to anyone.

    I don’t really have an opinion on Agile, even, I just have a problem with selling it this way.

    • magic_lobster_party@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      That’s fair enough. The common misconception is that waterfall is great for space missions, when in reality NASA is doing agile.

      I agree that not everybody is NASA, so what works for them doesn’t necessarily work for everyone.