Me and my friend were discussing this the other day about how he said RAID is no longer needed. He said it was due to how big SSDs have gotten and that apparently you can replace sectors within them if a problem occurs which is why having an array is not needed.

I replied with the fact that arrays allow for redundancy that create a faster uptime if there are issues and drive needs to be replaced. And depending on what you are doing, that is more valuable than just doing the new thing. Especially because RAID allows redundancy that can replicate lost data if needed depending on the configuration.

What do you all think?

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 months ago

    its not about the individual drive… its about total drive failure… if that ssd’s controller dies it doesnt matter if it has extra data sectors.

    that said, I moved on from raid by mirroring multiple , unraided NAS devices for redundancy with data stored specifically on the drives in such a way as to eliminate cross disk logical volumes.