By Xinghui Kok

SINGAPORE (Reuters) - Singapore on Monday passed a law to hold “dangerous offenders” indefinitely, even after they complete their jail sentences.

The legislation applies to those above 21 who are convicted of crimes such as culpable homicide, rape and sex with minors, who are deemed to be at risk of reoffending upon release.

In a speech in parliament, Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam said: “An offender who continues to pose a real danger to others should not be released.”

He gave an example of a man jailed for raping his 6-year-old stepdaughter, who, after his release started sexually assaulting his sister’s granddaughter who was 10 in 2015. In 2017, he sexually assaulted the girl’s younger sister who was 9.

“We have to deal with these kinds of menace and protect our society,” said Shanmugam.

The new law means that instead of being automatically released after completing their prison terms, such offenders would need the home affairs minister to decide that they were no longer a threat to the public.

The minister would be advised by a review board made up of experts such as retired judges, lawyers, psychiatrists and psychologists, and the offender and his lawyers can make representations to the board. Those found unfit for release will have their case reviewed annually.

Singapore estimates this law will affect fewer than 30 offenders a year.

  • UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I thought every country had this, but now I’m wondering if that’s not correct.

    From the Canadian criminal code:

    Sentence for dangerous offender

    (4) If the court finds an offender to be a dangerous offender, it shall

    (a) impose a sentence of detention in a penitentiary for an indeterminate period;

    But looking it up it is quite contentious. I always assumed it was more of a mental health diagnosis than a sentence. I’d be curious how many other countries have similar provisions .