Russia’s science and higher education ministry has dismissed the head of a prestigious genetics institute who sparked controversy by contending that humans once lived for centuries and that the shorter lives of modern humans are due to their ancestors’ sins, state news agency RIA-Novosti said Thursday.

Although the report did not give a reason for the firing of Alexander Kudryavtsev, the influential Russian Orthodox Church called it religious discrimination.

Kudryavtsev, who headed the Russian Academy of Science’s Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, made a presentation at a conference in 2023 in which he said people had lived for some 900 years prior to the era of the Biblical Flood and that “original, ancestral and personal sins” caused genetic diseases that shortened lifespans.

  • NOSin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Oh, I agree for the scientist in OP, dude lost his marbles or is coping hard on his cognitive dissonance, but my point was answering to the much simpler subject of “Scientists can’t be religious or they’re not proper scientists”.

    As to the very fine line religious scientists must walk, if we’re honest, it’s true of many things that make the life of a scientist, because it is measurable and can be approached scientifically, doesn’t mean they will approach and measure it that way, humans are fallible, and they often do fail, but that’s another subject.

    • Signtist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You’re absolutely right - ultimately, true scientific method is impossible for humans, since we all have biases, but striving for perfection is how we get as close as we can to it.

      As you mentioned, scientific progress can be made even with biased data from people who have let religion and science intermingle, but as others have shown in this thread, it often leads to a slow process of chipping away at society’s default answer of “God did it” little by little over time, which has significantly delayed scientific progress.

      Even just 100 years ago this man likely wouldn’t have lost his job for making a claim without data that sin has directly impacted human health, and I see the fact that it’s now an unacceptable claim to be an indication that science as a whole is becoming less biased, in part due to its further separation from religion.

      • NOSin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I do agree that they aren’t many, the ones who are actually careful about not mixing up their beliefs with science, sadly.

        I see we do agree in the end, it was an interesting talk, thank you for that.

        I do wonder if science really would have been quicker without religion tho. (Putting apart the time science treated religion as being heretic of course. I mean this in the “wouldn’t human find something else to be biased about/get their meaning lost in anyway” way)

        • Signtist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s possible that something else would’ve gotten in the way if religion hadn’t, but I guess we can leave that immeasurable thing up to faith as well. I’m glad we came to an agreement in the end.