Lee Jae Myung reiterates desire for full command back in Seoul’s hands after Donald Trump cuts joint exercises, citing warm ties with Kim Jong-un

South Korea’s president ⁠has renewed his push to regain independent control of the military from the US in the event of war and urged faster progress in acquiring nuclear-powered submarines after Donald Trump’s order to cut joint drills.

On Sunday night, Trump instructed the Pentagon to “substantially reduce” this week’s joint military exercises with South Korea, saying the nuclear-armed North “has been unthreatening and respectful” and that the US president had a “very good relationship with Kim Jong-un”.

Lee Jae Myung said on Tuesday that Seoul should ​proceed without disruption with ‌the planned transfer, during his term, of ‌wartime operational control, or Opcon, of South Korean forces from the US – a goal he and the government have long held.

  • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Bascially they need their own nukes now, as does Japan, Germany, Poland and Australia. Trump is destroying the basis for nuclear non proliferation that has been a cornerstone of the fragile stability we had in the past decades.

    • Cherry@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      I hope they enact their leverage as a chip producer. He thinks he is old school mob running a protection racket.

      So why should thier local producers sell a a key component to tech in a country who is trying to extort them.

    • robomuffin79@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Every nation with valuable resources should have nuclear weapons. It makes the world safer. How many lives could have been saved if Saddam or Qaddafi had nuclear weapons? Or if Iran did? North Korea has shown the vital importance of having them

      • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        You’re not wrong, but what happens when a country ‘elects’ a guy who thinks lobbing some plutonium at a hurricane will make it back down and go away and there need to be multiple people involved before anything is launched? MAD does work, but anything dealing with nuke stuff comes to “do this step by precise step or everyone dies” is something us humans should take a little more interest in directing as a planet not nations.

  • LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    So pretend to be friends with the president for a couple years, wait until he pulls military presence from the area then attack. What an easily manipulatable dipshit.

    • Nautalax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean it’s still rather unlikely for North Korea to be able to handle South Korea on their own. North Korea has half of South Korea’s population, far less industry and is technologically considerably behind. Their main advantage (which admittedly is pretty good) is that they can turn Seoul into a crater at any moment which is an unacceptable risk for South Korea. But that doesn’t mean NK will have a great time in war either.

      • LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m not speaking solely about the Korean peninsula. The same could be said for any country’s relation with the United States at the moment. Israel, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the Taliban, China, Russia, Yemen…

      • jrs100000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        The real danger is that a SK government in the future will decide to risk it and invade the north. The follow on effects in China and Japan could be highly destabilizing, even assuming South Korea’s industrial capacity survives unscathed. But I suppose the world has moved beyond “stability” as an end goal, and rolling the dice for the fate of billions is just another Friday night.

        • Nautalax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Why would any SK government go that far with the present circumstances? Seoul which is a city of outsize importance to SK would get promptly flattened by some combination of nuclear weapons and massive amounts of conventional artillery that has been pointed there for decades. Military giants China and/or Russia may decide to aid or defend their more politically aligned direct neighbor, even if for no other reason than to keep their border areas from falling into chaos. SK would likely be diplomatically isolated for undertaking such aggressive action, possibly sanctioned as well which would be massively painful to a country that trades as much as they do. All while the last people who remember a united Korea are well on their way to dying out. The war is hard enough if won and if somehow NK were to win the SK politicians who hypothetically launched the invasion would be in big trouble. But even with victory after the war they have to reckon with rebuilding not just surely massively damaged SK but also the north which was impoverished even before it was bombed out, handling the likely tens of millions of IDPs across both sides and simultaneously integrating couple tens of millions of people raised under a completely different system. And all this while ditched by their regular sponsor who declared a desire to support the other side.

          • jrs100000@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Because South Korea genuinely wants reunification, and if a future government believes that a stalemate is not achieving that they may explore other approaches. The US has been supporting South Korean defense, but has also been working to maintain the status quo in cases where SK has wanted to take a more aggressive stance.

  • plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    South Korea’s president ⁠has renewed his push to regain independent control of the military from the US

    laughs in SACEUR