Abid Malhi and Shafqat Ali were convicted of gang rape, kidnapping, robbery and terrorism offences back in March 2021 over the attack on the Sialkot-Lahore Motorway.
We have litteral tool that doesn’t let any doubt regarding that matter. It s such a terrible bad argument that it never applied in any other situation.
“”“A subsequent investigation revealed that Mr Scott had
become implicated as a result of accidental contamination
of samples within the lab. The day before processing samples
from the alleged rape victim, the lab had handled a DNA
sample from Mr Scott, following a ‘spitting incident’ in Exeter,
UK. Unfortunately the disposable plastic plate used to analyse
this sample had been inadvertently reused in the rape case,
resulting in the misidentification.”“”
Not to mention corrupt cops and prosecutors.
Why the need to kill people? Why not just isolate them? Do you think it’s actually more practical to kill them or it’s just so you can feel better knowing they are dead?
It’s actually good that you’re uninformed. You can educate yourself and this may help you evolve your opinions beyond primitive ideas of justice like “eye for an eye”.
(profiling is part of matching, you match DNA profiles, you don’t sequence the entire genome).
First one say judgment is longer yet doesn’t take into account the cos of prolonged incarceration anywhere. Just that the procedure is longer.
Second is a survey and a comparaison without any source regarding different place where a lot more factor are involved.
Thoses arent study but opinion pieces.
Try again.
Also I dont care about your view about eyes for eyes since death penalty can t never equal thoses. About Christchurch do u think his death will have as much value than every life he took ?
We have litteral tool that doesn’t let any doubt regarding that matter. It s such a terrible bad argument that it never applied in any other situation.
What “literal tool” is that?
Dna CCTV localisation any numeric trace
https://senseaboutscience.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/making-sense-of-forensic-genetics.pdf
“”“A subsequent investigation revealed that Mr Scott had become implicated as a result of accidental contamination of samples within the lab. The day before processing samples from the alleged rape victim, the lab had handled a DNA sample from Mr Scott, following a ‘spitting incident’ in Exeter, UK. Unfortunately the disposable plastic plate used to analyse this sample had been inadvertently reused in the rape case, resulting in the misidentification.”“”
Not to mention corrupt cops and prosecutors.
Why the need to kill people? Why not just isolate them? Do you think it’s actually more practical to kill them or it’s just so you can feel better knowing they are dead?
Practical, economical, dissuasive and also justified.
Your paper is about dna profiling and not matching.
It’s not economical, it’s common knowledge that the whole appeal process is more expensive then housing someone for life:
https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/dpi-series-facts-about-the-death-penalty-does-the-death-penalty-cost-less-than-life-without-parole
It’s also not dissuasive:
https://www.amnestyusa.org/issues/death-penalty/death-penalty-facts/the-death-penalty-and-deterrence/
https://deathpenaltyproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/The-Death-Penalty-Project_Policy-Deterrence.pdf
It’s actually good that you’re uninformed. You can educate yourself and this may help you evolve your opinions beyond primitive ideas of justice like “eye for an eye”.
(profiling is part of matching, you match DNA profiles, you don’t sequence the entire genome).
Your link lmao.
First one say judgment is longer yet doesn’t take into account the cos of prolonged incarceration anywhere. Just that the procedure is longer.
Second is a survey and a comparaison without any source regarding different place where a lot more factor are involved.
Thoses arent study but opinion pieces.
Try again.
Also I dont care about your view about eyes for eyes since death penalty can t never equal thoses. About Christchurch do u think his death will have as much value than every life he took ?
So you choose not to educate yourself. Sad but understandable.
I litteraly rebuke your link that were opinion pieces and you accuse me of refusing to educate myslef. Ok dude