• plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
    1·
    5 hours ago

    You realize I’m not reading any of that since it has NOTHING to do with your original point? Yeah?

    That you’ve been provided proof that lineups are purposely selected from criteria (like being a worm farmer). You’ve completely lost track of your original point, which turns out it’s simply you can fucking read apparantly, and are now bloviating about the validity of police lineups.

    You fucked up, and are now doubling and tripling down on fallacies, and just making yourself look like a fool while doing so.

    Get help. Seriously, this infatuation about arguing, while presented evidence is fucking unhealthy.

    • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      11·
      4 hours ago

      That you’ve been provided proof that lineups are purposely selected from criteria

      no, i havent. and in fact anyone asserting this is absolutely moronic and has no idea what they are talking about for reasons I’ve already mentioned.

      im not doubling down you dunces just dont know what you’re talking about. again as I’ve stated repeatedly.

      lets start over so you can understand:

      If you showed me a lineup of 10 guys and asked me which one ran a worm farm I feel like I would get it right 100% of the time.

      you have:

      • a line up of 10 guys.

      you are asked:

      • which one ran a worm farm

      facts:

      • nothing in the original statement mentioned any criteria for the 10 guys selected. you chucklefucks are just hallucinating worse than an LLm.
      • the only mention of a worm farmer is in the problem being posed to the OP (or you) which is entirely independent of the fucking line up.

      chucklefucks:

      • morons asserting that the question asked about a set has anything to do with how the set was generated.
      • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
        1·
        4 hours ago

        Not done bloviating eh?

        The criteria includes one person who is a worm farmer, anyone with more than a couple brain cells will be able to get this. Even after having this explained by multiple people, you’re still being obstinate.

        This is turning from funny to sad quick.

          • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
            11·
            4 hours ago

            So how many people need to explain the same thing to you before you realize that you’re wrong? There’s already 4.

            There’s no one here supporting you, I wonder why that is?

            • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
              12·
              4 hours ago

              because you’re all idiots an incapable of basic reasoning clearly. =)

              please feel free to re-read the entire thread as many times as you need to figure it out.

              • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
                1·
                4 hours ago

                If you run into an idiot in the morning, you ran into an idiot. If you run into idiots all day, you’re the idiot.

                ;)

                Well done

                I’ve read it multiple times, the only one who needs a clue is you. Take the hint dude, seriously.