• grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The string of bits doesn’t have to be part of an expensive blockchain though, it can just as easily be a generated uuid. In either case, the technology relies on multiple parties honouring your claim.

    Hell it could be tied to an email address and nothing else.

    • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yes it needs support, as almost all blockchains do, they are public consensus models. All it needs is for a token to connect to a specific piece of media. You prove ownership of that token and the streaming service honors your ownership. You move steaming services? They still honor your ownership. Likely also needs legislative support to enforce honoring the token and enforce studios to provide same access to all distributors.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’m torn between not wanting universal DRM and wanting to break up platform specific DRM.

        • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I think there are 2 types of drm, one is invasive and the other is permissive. Everything needs some sort of Auth and permission drm, and usually it sits in a company dB and if they go under or remove it, you lose Auth. I think that type of system can be better under a blockchain model, moving universal ownership to a decentralized ledger. Services still must recognize the ledger as valid, but then no single provider is the arbiter of your ownership and Auth.