Ethnicity is to race what sex is to gender. Race and gender are social constructs, while ethnicity and sex are biological categories that are often conflated with their sociological counterparts.
You wanted me to come up with a slur and then try to argue that it’s perfectly fine to say? I’m not going to do that, because I’m not a bigot. Just because you’re trying to mischaracterize me as one doesn’t mean you can bait me into talking like one.
And then you act offended that I didn’t blindly stumble into your transparent attempt at entrapment? You’re not worth arguing with.
You really think that the victims of transphobic talk are to blame.
Nothing I’ve said has been transphobic, you’re just using “victim blaming” as a shield to hide from information or ideas that conflict with your own.
As for the rest of your drivel, get over yourself. Trans men aren’t a fiction, and many of them do have ovaries. The fact that you’re manufacturing so much outrage over using sex as opposed to gender as a useful concept in medical contexts has the direct implication that doctors would be hindered from screening trans men for ovarian cancer. And if you can’t see that direct connection, then I can’t help you.
Feel free to blindly stumble into problems that no one could have foreseen because you’re so averse to anyone pointing out where some notions might lead.
manufacturing so much outrage over using sex as opposed to gender as a useful concept in medical contexts
That’s all on you honey, all you. The rest of us were talking about access to gendered spaces for trans people. No one except you is weirdly taking about banning words from medical discourse.
I’m done arguing with you.
Do you mean that literally, like my version of literally, when it’s literally true? Of course not!
Wait, I get it now! Almost everything you say isn’t true and has some bigger agenda. No wonder you assumed that someone else was behaving that way at the start of all this!
Ethnicity is to race what sex is to gender. Race and gender are social constructs, while ethnicity and sex are biological categories that are often conflated with their sociological counterparts.
You wanted me to come up with a slur and then try to argue that it’s perfectly fine to say? I’m not going to do that, because I’m not a bigot. Just because you’re trying to mischaracterize me as one doesn’t mean you can bait me into talking like one.
And then you act offended that I didn’t blindly stumble into your transparent attempt at entrapment? You’re not worth arguing with.
Nothing I’ve said has been transphobic, you’re just using “victim blaming” as a shield to hide from information or ideas that conflict with your own.
As for the rest of your drivel, get over yourself. Trans men aren’t a fiction, and many of them do have ovaries. The fact that you’re manufacturing so much outrage over using sex as opposed to gender as a useful concept in medical contexts has the direct implication that doctors would be hindered from screening trans men for ovarian cancer. And if you can’t see that direct connection, then I can’t help you.
Feel free to blindly stumble into problems that no one could have foreseen because you’re so averse to anyone pointing out where some notions might lead.
I’m done arguing with you.
You have a funny way of showing it.
That’s all on you honey, all you. The rest of us were talking about access to gendered spaces for trans people. No one except you is weirdly taking about banning words from medical discourse.
Do you mean that literally, like my version of literally, when it’s literally true? Of course not!
Wait, I get it now! Almost everything you say isn’t true and has some bigger agenda. No wonder you assumed that someone else was behaving that way at the start of all this!