Monopoly

Chess is decided on who makes critical mistakes. There is someone at fault, whether it is you or your opponent. The frustrating part, is always the one where you make a move you realize later that you shouldn’t have made and your opponent exploiting it.

Losing a game 7 of a championship series is the most frustrating game to lose in.

It’s a fact. Losing in chess always makes you feel incredibly stupid because the moves are always incredibly obvious in hindsight.

Monopoly ruins families

It’s frustrating cause you can’t blame it on anyone but yourself. There’s no luck involved.

I’d say the worst are when…

• You outplayed your opponent, but still lost

• The opponent is toxic

• Your teammates are actively throwing

• You put a significant investment into the game

Of those, usually only the last is true of chess. I’d say most Esports titles are worse. Nothing is as bad as being locked in a game of CS or Dota for an hour with a griefer, while the game is clearly otherwise winnable, and the opponents spend the whole game gloating about how good they are.

Whether the game is chess or League or whatever, your tilting comes from yourself, not from the game.

You probably know some people who play those same games and don’t tilt, even when they get a really bad break. Use those people as role models and get control of yourself.

I think the better you get the more frustrating it is to lose. Many of us barely know how the pieces move. I did not know about opasa or whatever until college.

No, the worst games to lose in are luck-based games.

Not for me (usually), because I know it’s a very complex game and that anyone who is more than passingly familiar with it is going to be better than me. My frustration level when I lose is directly proportional to the number of dumb mistakes I made. If I did well for my skill level and the other person just played better, then it becomes a learning opportunity rather a source of frustration.

This applies to other games as well. The only exception is when it’s a game where luck plays a big role and it just isn’t going my way that day. Then I’m not winning or learning, which can also be super frustrating.

It’s only frustrating if you’re solely focused on winning rather than improving, and especially if you do what I so often see, which is view your chess skill as a proxy for your intelligence (and thus take losses as a personal insult).

Smart people are not automatically great chess players. Chess is a skill you can develop that rewards time, dedication, patience, and lots and lots of practice (and losses).

In fact, losing a game of chess is incredibly valuable, and much more useful than almost any other game. You have a complete record of your game, and since no luck is involved, you can study your game and identify where you can improve. Reviewing your games is one of the best ways to get better at chess, and objectively looking at your game from both players’ perspectives also helps to make it more about improvement rather than personal failure. In fact, it’s fairly standard after an over the board game for both players to review the game together on the board and talk through lines and thoughts on the various positions of the game.

It’s one of the things I really love about the game, because it’s always about getting better rather than punishment for losing. It’s much, much better than video games in this way.

When I play chess, I mostly just want to have a good game of chess, even if I lose. I always take the opportunity to play much higher rated players given the chance, because even though I will almost certainly lose, the game will be a very rich one to review and learn from.

You might want to try some of the Souls games and enjoy whole new levels of being tilted.

Skill based + time sink is the worst IMO so yeah, chess fits the bill

Believe me GO is worse