This is “absence of evidence isn’t the evidence of absence” all over again…
It’s not a new study, it’s a review of prior studies…
So all it proves, is that no one has empirically proven the connection yet, which was the reason they did this literature review in the first place.
Research like this can be done by a single person without leaving their desk, in an average work day. The link even shows you the three searches they ran… It wasn’t the scientific equivalent of “googling it”.
It doesn’t prove anything, except how many people blindly up ote and don’t understand science.
This is “absence of evidence isn’t the evidence of absence” all over again…
It’s not a new study, it’s a review of prior studies…
So all it proves, is that no one has empirically proven the connection yet, which was the reason they did this literature review in the first place.
Research like this can be done by a single person without leaving their desk, in an average work day. The link even shows you the three searches they ran… It wasn’t the scientific equivalent of “googling it”.
It doesn’t prove anything, except how many people blindly up ote and don’t understand science.
Or “world news” which this apparently is?