Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-27 hours agoNo relationship between testosterone and risk aversion: A meta-analytic reviewwww.sciencedirect.comexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up162arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up161arrow-down1external-linkNo relationship between testosterone and risk aversion: A meta-analytic reviewwww.sciencedirect.comAatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-27 hours agomessage-square7fedilinkfile-text
Basically testosterone does not appear to encourage risk-taking. Other outlets: https://nautil.us/the-unbelievable-strength-of-the-testosterone-myth-1280799 https://www.psypost.org/the-testosterone-myth-large-analysis-finds-no-link-between-the-macho-hormone-and-risk-taking/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41638539/
minus-squarepanthera_@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 hours agoSomething must be causing it since males take greater risks than females. This also applies to animals.
minus-squaregivesomefucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 hours agoThe “study” is pointless They said “no one has studied this”, searched old studies, and then said “no one has studied this”. Anyone that thinks that means there isn’t a connection, don’t know what “meta-analysis” means or the basic ways the scientific community speaks… Which apparently is a lot of people on Lemmy because they just blindly upvoted it
Something must be causing it since males take greater risks than females. This also applies to animals.
The “study” is pointless
They said “no one has studied this”, searched old studies, and then said “no one has studied this”.
Anyone that thinks that means there isn’t a connection, don’t know what “meta-analysis” means or the basic ways the scientific community speaks…
Which apparently is a lot of people on Lemmy because they just blindly upvoted it