cm0002@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 21 days agoKind of impressive when you think about itinfosec.pubimagemessage-square150fedilinkarrow-up1911arrow-down114
arrow-up1897arrow-down1imageKind of impressive when you think about itinfosec.pubcm0002@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 21 days agomessage-square150fedilink
minus-squareREDACTED@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down7·edit-220 days agoAt the bottom? Is there a single LLM that has surpassed ChatGPT? EDIT: I missed Gemini 3.1 pro Still, saying “Everyone else catched up and it’s at the bottom now” is seriously out of touch thing to say
minus-squareREDACTED@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-220 days agoClaude outperforms in coding and agentic tasks. I asked about LLM as a chat model. It’s still in benchmarks at the top, and still the most popular one, by far.
minus-squaretimestatic@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5·20 days agoThe context was about coding specifically tho
minus-squareREDACTED@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-220 days agoI was directly questioning the “at the bottom” phrase, not the entire context. Context matters, or something That being said: Source
At the bottom? Is there a single LLM that has surpassed ChatGPT?
EDIT: I missed Gemini 3.1 pro
Still, saying “Everyone else catched up and it’s at the bottom now” is seriously out of touch thing to say
Claude
Claude outperforms in coding and agentic tasks. I asked about LLM as a chat model. It’s still in benchmarks at the top, and still the most popular one, by far.
The context was about coding specifically tho
I was directly questioning the “at the bottom” phrase, not the entire context. Context matters, or something
That being said:
Source