Giving the far-right this as a way to appease them, just validates their world view. Its not as if it is going to end with drastically reducing immigrants.
No, their rising popularity validates their view. By adopting their view but not to their extreme undermines their appeal. How can sending rejected asylum seekers to third-country hubs not reduce the number of migrants?
That’s a good move. It will stem the rising popularity of far-right parties. Europeans do not want their countries to be flooded with migrants.
Giving the far-right this as a way to appease them, just validates their world view. Its not as if it is going to end with drastically reducing immigrants.
No, their rising popularity validates their view. By adopting their view but not to their extreme undermines their appeal. How can sending rejected asylum seekers to third-country hubs not reduce the number of migrants?
Far right parties love to say that even when there are no migrants flooding them.
Continues with a sentence straight out of the far-right fascism playbook
To the contrary, it will undermine the appeal of far-right parties. At the same time the centrist version will be milder.
speak for yourself