cm0002@mander.xyz to Memes@sopuli.xyz · 17 hours agosystemdlemmy.mlimagemessage-square63fedilinkarrow-up1418arrow-down19cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1409arrow-down1imagesystemdlemmy.mlcm0002@mander.xyz to Memes@sopuli.xyz · 17 hours agomessage-square63fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarelazynooblet@lazysoci.allinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·13 hours agoI remember when systemd was a replacement for sysvinit and it was a slight delay to relearn but overall an improvement. Then they started adding services, and that’s where I started to not get along with it. ntpd, resolver, networking, replacing ssh startup with a triggered socket. These got on my nerves and felt like it was overstepping.
minus-squareThe_Decryptor@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 hours ago replacing ssh startup with a triggered socket Socket activation itself isn’t exactly new, inetd got added to BSD in 1986.
minus-squareYerbouti@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·9 hours agoYeah that was the good time! Just kidding I have no clue what you’re talking about.
I remember when systemd was a replacement for sysvinit and it was a slight delay to relearn but overall an improvement.
Then they started adding services, and that’s where I started to not get along with it.
ntpd, resolver, networking, replacing ssh startup with a triggered socket. These got on my nerves and felt like it was overstepping.
Socket activation itself isn’t exactly new, inetd got added to BSD in 1986.
Yeah that was the good time! Just kidding I have no clue what you’re talking about.