• Vegan_Joe@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Dumb question, but…is Claude worse than GPT or Gemini?

    I was under the impression that it was the lesser of evils

    • BJW@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They are the lesser of the available evils. Anthropic, the proprietors of Claude, were blacklisted by the US administration for refusing to greenlight their technology being used for fascism.

    • subnormal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      There are many less evils. Use open source/weight AI like Kimi, GLM, Deepseek, Mistral, Olmo, Arcee, Minimax, Qwen, Exaone, NVidia, Sarvam…

      If you don’t have the hardware to run locally, you can pay for API. If you find the company problematic for whatever reason, you can switch to the same model served by a third party (possible because the model weights are publicly released).

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      It is better than GPT and Gemini but not great. Claude some US military contracts. At least to public knowledge.

      https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/04/pentagon-blacklist-anthropic-defense-tech-claude.html

      Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declared on X that any contractor or supplier doing business with the U.S. military is barred from commercial activity with Anthropic.

      The announcement came after Anthropic executives refused to comply with the government’s demands over its model use. They wanted assurances that their AI would not be tapped for fully autonomous weapons or mass domestic surveillance of America.

      Anthropic’s models are still being used to support the U.S. military operations in Iran, even after the announcement from the Trump administration, as CNBC previously reported.

    • rozodru@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      less of the evils. That being said as far as quality goes Claude has taken a very noticeable decline in quality within the past several months. used to be half decent but now 8 to 9 times out of 10 you’re going to get an hallucination for a solution. Anthropic has REALLY dropped the ball with Claude and Claude code. absolute garbage LLM now.

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      In what manner? Capabilities, or belonging to an evil corporation that happily steals data and works to undermine democracy?

    • hoch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      4 hours ago

      No. Many people here just hate LLMs in general and will use every opportunity to complain about it.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Personally I dislike how helpless and useless it makes my fellow colleagues at research.
        No thought given, use the first web result (and in most cases, just accept the AI output as search gospel).

        In my case it’s only used for very obscure issue descriptions my google-fu isnt sufficient enough for or correlating weird bugs with each other.

      • BJW@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’d say 99.9% of people. You’re actually the first other person I’ve seen who doesn’t!