spoiler

Personally? No, absolutely not. There should be no differentiating between what can be measured, and what cannot.

I can’t help but look at the reproducibility issue in “Psychology” and notice, what did they do about it? Nothing. It just exists. It’s not real science.

  • UNY0N@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    By all psychologists?

    I agree that there is some stupid stuff being done in the name of science, 100%. But the discipline isn’t really the deciding factor imho.

    If you are interested, here is sabine explaining how academic is fundamentally broken.

    https://youtu.be/LKiBlGDfRU8