More people do X makes X more done.

why does it fail so horribly for X = protecting a secret? or does it?

(I’m not 3, by the way…)

  • HeHoXa@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    In a sense, more people working towards secret protection generally did result in better secret protection, like encryption algorithms and secure architecture and whatnot.

    It only starts to become a paradox when you get into actually executing the task of protecting a specific secret… but I think we could draw that line somewhere for almost any task.

    There is a point of generality where more people means better results and a point of specificity where you only want the exact right number of people.