• litchralee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    if properly reviewed and it works right, you can’t argue with results.

    The key word is “if”.

    This is rather the crux of the issue: most AI-generated code is not reviewed, let alone reviewed by humans, let alone reviewed by human experts within their expertise. Nor does AI-generated code have a good history of being well-tested to any particular formal standard of validation (eg ISO), against any defined criteria that isn’t itself AI-generated and unreviewed. There are outliers, no doubt, which strive to lift themselves above this low-bar, though the effort to do so often exceeds the effort to just have the experts hand-write the code instead and then formally validate it, at least as of early 2026.

    Some AI could plausibly be tolerable within an already-functioning software engineering team. But “all code in Trail Mate is 100% generated by AI under human guidance” is an abdication too far.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      While all true, In my case, I am willing to take the risk in low stakes devices because the overall usefulness of this firmware as-designed is too perfect for me to pass up.