Why should Israel get anything when they have killed 100s of thousands of civilians? And no, this is not an invitation for you to false equivalence ‘but HAMAS’ this because when people are attacked on their land, they are entitled to defend themselves.
Your analogy is incorrect. In my proposal Israel gets something new, a chunk of the Sinai. In your analogy, I get nothing new.
Why should Israel get anything when they have killed 100s of thousands of civilians? And no, this is not an invitation for you to false equivalence ‘but HAMAS’ this because when people are attacked on their land, they are entitled to defend themselves.
Israel has to be given something otherwise; there will be no peace in the Middle East and Israel will continue to take land.
In my analogy you’re not israel lmao